Product comparison · 2 dot matrix printers

Epson C11CF39202 dot matrix printer 584 cps vs Fujitsu DL 9300

Add a product
  • 4specifications compared
  • 3differ
  • 1identical
  • 29known for one product only

Key differences

The Epson C11CF39202 dot matrix printer 584 cps has 152 cps more maximum print speed than the Fujitsu DL 9300 (584 cps vs 432 cps). The Epson C11CF39202 dot matrix printer 584 cps has 1 dB more sound pressure level (printing) than the Fujitsu DL 9300 (55 dB vs 54 dB). The Fujitsu DL 9300 has 4.8 kg more weight than the Epson C11CF39202 dot matrix printer 584 cps (12 kg vs 7.2 kg).

  • Maximum print speed
    • C11CF39202 dot matrix printer 584 cps:584 cps
    • DL 9300:432 cps
  • Sound pressure level (printing)
    • C11CF39202 dot matrix printer 584 cps:55 dB
    • DL 9300:54 dB
  • Weight
    • C11CF39202 dot matrix printer 584 cps:7.2 kg
    • DL 9300:12 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of C11CF39202, DL 9300
33 specifications
Printing1 differ
Maximum printing width (columns)Known for one80Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum print speedDiffers584 cps432 cps
Character pitchKnown for one10,12 cpiUnknown — not stated by the source
Built-in barcodesKnown for oneCode 128 (A/B/C), Code 39, EAN13, EAN8, Interleaved 2/5, POSTNET, UPC-A, UPC-EUnknown — not stated by the source
Character setsKnown for oneItalic, PC437, PC850, PC858, Roman 8Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum resolutionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source360 x 360 DPI
Character densityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source80 cpi
Maximum number of copiesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source7 copies
Paper handlingidentical
Paper tray media typesKnown for oneEnvelopes, Labels, RollUnknown — not stated by the source
Continuous paper thickness rangeKnown for one0.065 - 0.49 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Label thickness rangeKnown for one0.16 - 0.19 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Multi-part paper thickness rangeKnown for one0.12 - 0.46 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Single sheet thickness rangeKnown for one0.065 - 0.14 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Features1 differ
Product colourKnown for oneBlackUnknown — not stated by the source
Buffer sizeKnown for one128 KBUnknown — not stated by the source
Sound pressure level (printing)Differs55 dB54 dB
CertificationKnown for oneROHSUnknown — not stated by the source
Page description languagesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceEpson ESC/P2
Ports & interfacesidentical
Standard interfacesKnown for oneEthernet, Parallel, USB 2.0Unknown — not stated by the source
Enduranceidentical
Print headKnown for one24-pinUnknown — not stated by the source
Print head lifeKnown for one400 million charactersUnknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one5 - 35 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one10 - 80%Unknown — not stated by the source
System requirementsidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for oneWindows 10, Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows Vista, Windows XP HomeUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WidthKnown for one437 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one375 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one177 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
WeightDiffers7.2 kg12 kg
Technical detailsidentical
Sustainability certificatesKnown for oneENERGY STARUnknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source456 x 300 x 250 mm
Fonts includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCourier 10, Prestige Elite 12, Pica 10, OCR-A 10, OCR-B 10, Boldface PS, EscalablesCourier, Timeless, Nimbus Sans
Media thicknessKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.65 mm

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More dot matrix printer comparisons

All dot matrix printer comparisons