Product comparison · 2 docking speakers

Philips DS1600/77 docking speaker vs Samsung DA-E570 2.0 channels

Add a product
  • 11specifications compared
  • 9differ
  • 2identical
  • 20known for one product only

Key differences

The Samsung DA-E570 2.0 channels has 2 W more RMS rated power than the Philips DS1600/77 docking speaker (10 W vs 8 W). The Samsung DA-E570 2.0 channels has 203.7 mm more width than the Philips DS1600/77 docking speaker (299.7 mm vs 96 mm). The Philips DS1600/77 docking speaker has 54.8 mm more depth than the Samsung DA-E570 2.0 channels (225 mm vs 170.2 mm). Only the Samsung DA-E570 2.0 channels has Bluetooth.

  • RMS rated power
    • DS1600/77 docking speaker:8 W
    • DA-E570 2.0 channels:10 W
  • Bluetooth
    • DS1600/77 docking speaker:No
    • DA-E570 2.0 channels:Yes
  • Width
    • DS1600/77 docking speaker:96 mm
    • DA-E570 2.0 channels:299.7 mm
  • Depth
    • DS1600/77 docking speaker:225 mm
    • DA-E570 2.0 channels:170.2 mm
  • Height
    • DS1600/77 docking speaker:143 mm
    • DA-E570 2.0 channels:114.3 mm
  • Package width
    • DS1600/77 docking speaker:127 mm
    • DA-E570 2.0 channels:414 mm
  • Package depth
    • DS1600/77 docking speaker:261 mm
    • DA-E570 2.0 channels:170.2 mm
  • Package height
    • DS1600/77 docking speaker:187 mm
    • DA-E570 2.0 channels:256.5 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of DS1600/77, DA-E570
31 specifications
Audio1 differ
RMS rated powerDiffers8 W10 W
Audio output channelsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.0 channels
Ports & interfaces1 differ
BluetoothDiffersNoYes
Apple Lightning docking connectorKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
DC-in jackKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Bluetooth versionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3.0+HS
Performance1 differ
Apple docking compatibilityDiffersiPad, iPad 2, iPad mini, iPhone, iPhone 3G, iPhone 3GS, iPhone 4, iPhone 4S, iPhone 5, iPhone 5c, iPhone 5s, iPod, iPod Classic 1, iPod Classic 2, iPod Classic 3, iPod Classic 4, iPod Classic 5, iPod Classic 6, iPod Mini 1, iPod Mini 2, iPod Nano 1, iPod Nano 2, iPod Nano 3, iPod Nano 4, iPod Nano 5iPhone, iPod
Mobile operating systems supportedKnown for oneiOSUnknown — not stated by the source
CompatibilityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceiPod/IPhone, Galaxy S2 and Above, Galaxy Note, Galaxy Player
Radioidentical
FM radioKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Displayidentical
Clock functionKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Product colourBlackBlack
Volume controlKnown for oneDigitalUnknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Power source typeKnown for oneACUnknown — not stated by the source
Built-in chargerKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
AC input frequencyKnown for one50 - 60 HzUnknown — not stated by the source
AC input voltageKnown for one100-240 VUnknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
USB charging portKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions6 differ
WidthDiffers96 mm299.7 mm
DepthDiffers225 mm170.2 mm
HeightDiffers143 mm114.3 mm
Package widthDiffers127 mm414 mm
Package depthDiffers261 mm170.2 mm
Package heightDiffers187 mm256.5 mm
WeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2 kg
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.7 kg
Other featuresidentical
Apple 30-pin docking connectorKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Audio input11
Internet radioKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Audio amplifierKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Packaging contentidentical
Remote control includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More docking speakers comparisons

All docking speakers comparisons