Product comparison · 2 docking speakers

Philips AD305/37 docking speaker 2.0 channels vs Philips DS3205/98 docking speaker

Add a product
  • 18specifications compared
  • 10differ
  • 8identical
  • 18known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips DS3205/98 docking speaker has 6 W more RMS rated power than the Philips AD305/37 docking speaker 2.0 channels (10 W vs 4 W). The Philips DS3205/98 docking speaker has 8 mm more width than the Philips AD305/37 docking speaker 2.0 channels (224 mm vs 216 mm). The Philips DS3205/98 docking speaker has 18 mm more depth than the Philips AD305/37 docking speaker 2.0 channels (120 mm vs 102 mm). Apple docking compatibility: iPhone 5, iPod Nano 7, iPod Touch 5 on the Philips AD305/37 docking speaker 2.0 channels, iPod Nano 7, iPod Touch 5 on the Philips DS3205/98 docking speaker. Weight: 680 g on the Philips AD305/37 docking speaker 2.0 channels, 1.1 kg on the Philips DS3205/98 docking speaker.

  • RMS rated power
    • AD305/37 docking speaker 2.0 channels:4 W
    • DS3205/98 docking speaker:10 W
  • Width
    • AD305/37 docking speaker 2.0 channels:216 mm
    • DS3205/98 docking speaker:224 mm
  • Depth
    • AD305/37 docking speaker 2.0 channels:102 mm
    • DS3205/98 docking speaker:120 mm
  • Height
    • AD305/37 docking speaker 2.0 channels:112 mm
    • DS3205/98 docking speaker:162 mm
  • Weight
    • AD305/37 docking speaker 2.0 channels:680 g
    • DS3205/98 docking speaker:1.1 kg
  • Package width
    • AD305/37 docking speaker 2.0 channels:241 mm
    • DS3205/98 docking speaker:240 mm
  • Package depth
    • AD305/37 docking speaker 2.0 channels:136 mm
    • DS3205/98 docking speaker:145 mm
  • Package height
    • AD305/37 docking speaker 2.0 channels:153 mm
    • DS3205/98 docking speaker:240 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of AD305/37, DS3205/98
36 specifications
Audio1 differ
Audio output channelsKnown for one2.0 channelsUnknown — not stated by the source
RMS rated powerDiffers4 W10 W
Ports & interfacesidentical
BluetoothNoNo
AUX inKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
DC-in jackKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Apple Lightning docking connectorKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Headphone connectivityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3.5 mm
Performance1 differ
Apple docking compatibilityDiffersiPhone 5, iPod Nano 7, iPod Touch 5iPod Nano 7, iPod Touch 5
Bass reflexKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
EqualizerNoNo
Alarm clockKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
CompatibilityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceiPhone 5
Radioidentical
FM radioNoNo
Displayidentical
DisplayKnown for oneLEDUnknown — not stated by the source
Backlight displayKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Product colourBlackBlack
Volume controlKnown for oneDigitalUnknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Power source typeACAC
Built-in chargerYesYes
AC input frequency50 - 60 Hz50 - 60 Hz
AC input voltage100 - 240 V100 - 240 V
Number of batteries supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4
Battery life (max)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source8 h
Battery typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAA
Weight & dimensions8 differ
WidthDiffers216 mm224 mm
DepthDiffers102 mm120 mm
HeightDiffers112 mm162 mm
WeightDiffers680 g1.1 kg
Package widthDiffers241 mm240 mm
Package depthDiffers136 mm145 mm
Package heightDiffers153 mm240 mm
Package weightDiffers1.08 kg1.33 kg
Other featuresidentical
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one241 x 136 x 153 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Clock/Date displayKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Audio systemKnown for oneStereoUnknown — not stated by the source
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one216 x 102 x 112 mmUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More docking speakers comparisons

All docking speakers comparisons