Product comparison · 2 disk arrays

Fujitsu ETERNUS CS800 M1 vs Fujitsu ETERNUS DX100 S5

Add a product
  • 10specifications compared
  • 5differ
  • 5identical
  • 15known for one product only

Key differences

The Fujitsu ETERNUS CS800 M1 has 11.4 TB more total installed storage capacity than the Fujitsu ETERNUS DX100 S5 (15 TB vs 3.6 TB). The Fujitsu ETERNUS DX100 S5 has 4,194 TB more maximum supported storage capacity than the Fujitsu ETERNUS CS800 M1 (4424 TB vs 230 TB). The Fujitsu ETERNUS DX100 S5 has 9.6 kg more weight than the Fujitsu ETERNUS CS800 M1 (35 kg vs 25.4 kg). Only the Fujitsu ETERNUS CS800 M1 has storage drives installed. Operating temperature (T-T): 15 - 35 °C on the Fujitsu ETERNUS CS800 M1, 10 - 40 °C on the Fujitsu ETERNUS DX100 S5.

  • Storage drives installed
    • ETERNUS CS800 M1:Yes
    • ETERNUS DX100 S5:No
  • Total installed storage capacity
    • ETERNUS CS800 M1:15 TB
    • ETERNUS DX100 S5:3.6 TB
  • Maximum supported storage capacity
    • ETERNUS CS800 M1:230 TB
    • ETERNUS DX100 S5:4424 TB
  • Weight
    • ETERNUS CS800 M1:25.4 kg
    • ETERNUS DX100 S5:35 kg
  • Operating temperature (T-T)
    • ETERNUS CS800 M1:15 - 35 °C
    • ETERNUS DX100 S5:10 - 40 °C

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of ETERNUS CS800 M1, ETERNUS DX100 S5
25 specifications
Storage3 differ
Storage drives installedDiffersYesNo
Installed storage drive typeHDDHDD
Number of storage drives installedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2
Total installed storage capacityDiffers15 TB3.6 TB
Supported storage drive typesHDD & SSDHDD & SSD
Number of storage drives supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source24
Maximum supported storage capacityDiffers230 TB4424 TB
Storage drive capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.8 GB
Storage drive interfaceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceSerial Attached SCSI (SAS)
Storage drive sizes supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.5,3.5"
RAID levelsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0, 1, 1+0, 5, 5+0, 6
Data transfer rateKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source12 Gbit/s
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB connectivityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Designidentical
Device classKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceSmall & Medium Business
Chassis typeRack (2U)Rack (2U)
LED indicatorsYesYes
Noise levelKnown for one72 dBUnknown — not stated by the source
System requirementsidentical
Server operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceWindows Server 2008, Windows Server 2008 R2, Windows Server 2008 R2 x64, Windows Server 2008 x64, Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2012 R2, Windows Server 2012 R2 x64, Windows Server 2012 x64
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers25.4 kg35 kg
WidthKnown for one717.6 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one482 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one86.8 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs15 - 35 °C10 - 40 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)20 - 80%20 - 80%
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source84717020

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More disk array comparisons

All disk array comparisons