Product comparison · 2 dishwashers

Whirlpool WIP 4O32 PT vs Whirlpool WRBC 3C24 P X

Add a product
  • 36specifications compared
  • 7differ
  • 29identical
  • 1known for one product only

Key differences

  • Appliance placement
    • WIP 4O32 PT:Fully built-in
    • WRBC 3C24 P X:Semi built-in
  • Noise level
    • WIP 4O32 PT:42 dB
    • WRBC 3C24 P X:44 dB
  • Cycle time
    • WIP 4O32 PT:215 min
    • WRBC 3C24 P X:190 min
  • Energy efficiency class (legacy scale)
    • WIP 4O32 PT:A+++
    • WRBC 3C24 P X:A++
  • Energy consumption per cycle
    • WIP 4O32 PT:0.833 kWh
    • WRBC 3C24 P X:0.934 kWh
  • Depth
    • WIP 4O32 PT:555 mm
    • WRBC 3C24 P X:570 mm
  • Annual energy consumption
    • WIP 4O32 PT:238 kWh
    • WRBC 3C24 P X:266 kWh

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of WIP 4O32 PT, WRBC 3C24 P X
37 specifications
Design1 differ
Appliance placementDiffersFully built-inSemi built-in
Performance2 differ
Noise levelDiffers42 dB44 dB
Cycle timeDiffers215 min190 min
Ergonomicsidentical
Remaining time indicationKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Power2 differ
Energy efficiency class (legacy scale)DiffersA+++A++
Energy consumption per cycleDiffers0.833 kWh0.934 kWh
Weight & dimensions1 differ
DepthDiffers555 mm570 mm
Other features1 differ
Annual energy consumptionDiffers238 kWh266 kWh

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More dishwasher comparisons

All dishwasher comparisons