Product comparison · 2 dishwashers

AEG F56602ID0P Semi built-in 13 place settings vs AEG F66702IM0P Semi built-in 15 place settings

Add a product
  • 40specifications compared
  • 9differ
  • 31identical
  • 0known for one product only

Key differences

The AEG F66702IM0P Semi built-in 15 place settings has 2 place settings more place settings than the AEG F56602ID0P Semi built-in 13 place settings (15 place settings vs 13 place settings). The AEG F56602ID0P Semi built-in 13 place settings has 2 dB more noise level than the AEG F66702IM0P Semi built-in 15 place settings (46 dB vs 44 dB). The AEG F66702IM0P Semi built-in 15 place settings has 0.029 kWh more energy consumption per cycle than the AEG F56602ID0P Semi built-in 13 place settings (0.961 kWh vs 0.932 kWh). Control panel colour: Black, Brown on the AEG F56602ID0P Semi built-in 13 place settings, Black, Stainless steel on the AEG F66702IM0P Semi built-in 15 place settings. Control type: Buttons on the AEG F56602ID0P Semi built-in 13 place settings, Touch on the AEG F66702IM0P Semi built-in 15 place settings.

  • Control panel colour
    • F56602ID0P Semi built-in 13 place settings:Black, Brown
    • F66702IM0P Semi built-in 15 place settings:Black, Stainless steel
  • Control type
    • F56602ID0P Semi built-in 13 place settings:Buttons
    • F66702IM0P Semi built-in 15 place settings:Touch
  • Number of place settings
    • F56602ID0P Semi built-in 13 place settings:13 place settings
    • F66702IM0P Semi built-in 15 place settings:15 place settings
  • Noise level
    • F56602ID0P Semi built-in 13 place settings:46 dB
    • F66702IM0P Semi built-in 15 place settings:44 dB
  • Energy consumption per cycle
    • F56602ID0P Semi built-in 13 place settings:0.932 kWh
    • F66702IM0P Semi built-in 15 place settings:0.961 kWh
  • Water consumption per cycle
    • F56602ID0P Semi built-in 13 place settings:10.2 L
    • F66702IM0P Semi built-in 15 place settings:11 L
  • Annual energy consumption
    • F56602ID0P Semi built-in 13 place settings:262 kWh
    • F66702IM0P Semi built-in 15 place settings:270 kWh
  • Annual water consumption
    • F56602ID0P Semi built-in 13 place settings:2860 L
    • F66702IM0P Semi built-in 15 place settings:3080 L

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of F56602ID0P, F66702IM0P
40 specifications
Design2 differ
Appliance placementSemi built-inSemi built-in
Door colourNot applicableNot applicable
Control panel colourDiffersBlack, BrownBlack, Stainless steel
Control typeDiffersButtonsTouch
Built-in displayYesYes
Water fillCold, HotCold, Hot
Upper basket adjustable heightYesYes
Cutlery compartment typeBasketBasket
Performance3 differ
Number of place settingsDiffers13 place settings15 place settings
Number of washing programs66
Noise levelDiffers46 dB44 dB
Dishwashing programsDiffersAuto 45-70°C, Eco, Glass/Delicate, Intensive, Pre-wash, QuickAuto 45-70°C, Eco, Glass/Delicate, Intensive, Quick
Number of temperature settings44
Temperature (max)60 °C60 °C
Cycle time225 min225 min
Delayed start timerYesYes
Delay start (max)24 h24 h
AquaSensor functionYesYes
Glass protectionYesYes
Inverter technologyYesYes
Ergonomicsidentical
Multitab optionYesYes
Remaining time indicationYesYes
Rinse aid indicatorYesYes
Salt indicatorYesYes
Power2 differ
Energy efficiency class (legacy scale)A++A++
Energy consumption per cycleDiffers0.932 kWh0.961 kWh
Water consumption per cycleDiffers10.2 L11 L
Connected load2200 W2200 W
Power consumption (off)0.1 W0.1 W
AC input voltage220 - 240 V220 - 240 V
Current10 A10 A
Weight & dimensionsidentical
Width596 mm596 mm
Depth575 mm575 mm
Height818 mm818 mm
Installation compartment width60 cm60 cm
Installation compartment depth57 cm57 cm
Installation compartment height82 cm82 cm
Other features2 differ
Annual energy consumptionDiffers262 kWh270 kWh
Annual water consumptionDiffers2860 L3080 L
Drying classAA

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More dishwasher comparisons

All dishwasher comparisons