Product comparison · 2 digital photo frames

Hama 8.9 cm (3.5") Slim-Traveller Digital Photo Frame vs Hama Premium Digital Photo Frame

Add a product
  • 11specifications compared
  • 9differ
  • 2identical
  • 18known for one product only

Key differences

The Hama 8.9 cm (3.5") Slim-Traveller Digital Photo Frame has 128 MB more internal memory than the Hama Premium Digital Photo Frame (256 MB vs 128 MB). The Hama Premium Digital Photo Frame has 206 mm more width than the Hama 8.9 cm (3.5") Slim-Traveller Digital Photo Frame (300 mm vs 94 mm). The Hama 8.9 cm (3.5") Slim-Traveller Digital Photo Frame has 30 mm more depth than the Hama Premium Digital Photo Frame (70 mm vs 40 mm). Display diagonal: 8.89 cm (3.5") on the Hama 8.9 cm (3.5") Slim-Traveller Digital Photo Frame, 26.4 cm (10.4") on the Hama Premium Digital Photo Frame. Display resolution: 320 x 234 pixels on the Hama 8.9 cm (3.5") Slim-Traveller Digital Photo Frame, 640 x 480 pixels on the Hama Premium Digital Photo Frame.

  • Display diagonal
    • 8.9 cm (3.5") Slim-Traveller Digital Photo Frame:8.89 cm (3.5")
    • Premium Digital Photo Frame:26.4 cm (10.4")
  • Display resolution
    • 8.9 cm (3.5") Slim-Traveller Digital Photo Frame:320 x 234 pixels
    • Premium Digital Photo Frame:640 x 480 pixels
  • Image formats supported
    • 8.9 cm (3.5") Slim-Traveller Digital Photo Frame:JPG
    • Premium Digital Photo Frame:BMP, GIF, JPG, PNG, TIF
  • Internal memory
    • 8.9 cm (3.5") Slim-Traveller Digital Photo Frame:256 MB
    • Premium Digital Photo Frame:128 MB
  • Product colour
    • 8.9 cm (3.5") Slim-Traveller Digital Photo Frame:White
    • Premium Digital Photo Frame:Black
  • Width
    • 8.9 cm (3.5") Slim-Traveller Digital Photo Frame:94 mm
    • Premium Digital Photo Frame:300 mm
  • Depth
    • 8.9 cm (3.5") Slim-Traveller Digital Photo Frame:70 mm
    • Premium Digital Photo Frame:40 mm
  • Height
    • 8.9 cm (3.5") Slim-Traveller Digital Photo Frame:96 mm
    • Premium Digital Photo Frame:240 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 8.9 cm (3.5") Slim-Traveller Digital Photo Frame, Premium Digital Photo Frame
29 specifications
Display2 differ
Display diagonalDiffers8.89 cm (3.5")26.4 cm (10.4")
Display resolutionDiffers320 x 234 pixels640 x 480 pixels
Display brightnessKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source200 cd/m²
Contrast ratio (typical)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source300:1
DisplayKnown for oneLCDUnknown — not stated by the source
Aspect ratioKnown for one4:3Unknown — not stated by the source
File formats1 differ
Image formats supportedDiffersJPGBMP, GIF, JPG, PNG, TIF
Video formats supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAVI, MPEG4
Storage1 differ
Internal memoryDiffers256 MB128 MB
Card reader integratedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
BluetoothKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
InterfaceKnown for oneUSB 2.0Unknown — not stated by the source
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Audioidentical
Built-in speaker(s)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Image editing/playbackidentical
Photo editKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceRotate
Zoom capabilityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Features1 differ
Product colourDiffersWhiteBlack
Alarm clockKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
CalendarKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Wall mountableKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Management featuresidentical
Remote control includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers94 mm300 mm
DepthDiffers70 mm40 mm
HeightDiffers96 mm240 mm
WeightDiffers182 g1.52 kg
Dimensions (W x D x H) with standKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source300 x 40 x 240 mm
Other featuresidentical
USB ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More digital photo frame comparisons

All digital photo frame comparisons