All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 digital photo frames

Hama 00118561 digital photo frame Silver vs Philips SPF1902R/G7 digital photo frame Red

Add a product
  • 21specifications compared
  • 10differ
  • 11identical
  • 30known for one product only

Key differences

The Hama 00118561 digital photo frame Silver has 487 g more weight than the Philips SPF1902R/G7 digital photo frame Red (525 g vs 38 g). Only the Hama 00118561 digital photo frame Silver has LED backlight. Only the Hama 00118561 digital photo frame Silver has card reader integrated. Display diagonal: 25.4 cm (10") on the Hama 00118561 digital photo frame Silver, 3.81 cm (1.5") on the Philips SPF1902R/G7 digital photo frame Red. Display resolution: 1024 x 768 pixels on the Hama 00118561 digital photo frame Silver, 128 x 128 pixels on the Philips SPF1902R/G7 digital photo frame Red.

  • Display diagonal
    • 25.4 cm (10")
    • 3.81 cm (1.5")
  • Display resolution
    • 1024 x 768 pixels
    • 128 x 128 pixels
  • Display
    • TFT
    • LCD
  • LED backlight
    • Yes
    • No
  • Card reader integrated
    • Yes
    • No
  • Photo edit
    • Rotate, Zoom & crop
    • Copy
  • Product colour
    • Silver
    • Red
  • Power source type
    • AC
    • Battery

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
51 specifications
A

Hama

00118561 digital photo frame Silver

Model 00118561

View product
B

Philips

SPF1902R/G7 digital photo frame Red

Model SPF1902R/G7

View product
Display4 differ
Display diagonalDiffers25.4 cm (10")3.81 cm (1.5")
Display resolutionDiffers1024 x 768 pixels128 x 128 pixels
DisplayDiffersTFTLCD
Display brightnessKnown for one150 cd/m²
Contrast ratio (typical)Known for one400:1
Aspect ratioKnown for one4:3
TouchscreenNoNo
3DNoNo
LED backlightDiffersYesNo
File formatsidentical
Image formats supportedJPGJPG
Storage1 differ
Card reader integratedDiffersYesNo
Compatible memory cardsKnown for oneMMC, SD, SDHC
Ports & interfacesidentical
InterfaceUSB 2.0USB 2.0
USB 2.0 ports quantity11
BluetoothNoNo
Wi-FiNoNo
Ethernet LANNoNo
Headphone connectivityNoNo
Audioidentical
Built-in speaker(s)NoNo
Image editing/playback1 differ
SlideshowKnown for oneYes
Slideshow settingKnown for oneRandom
Photo editDiffersRotate, Zoom & cropCopy
Zoom capabilityKnown for oneYes
Album organizationKnown for oneYes
Features1 differ
Video playbackNoNo
Product colourDiffersSilverRed
Clock functionKnown for oneYes
Adjustable standKnown for oneYes
Clock with calendarKnown for oneYes
Plug and PlayKnown for oneYes
Management featuresidentical
Remote control includedKnown for oneYes
Power1 differ
Power source typeDiffersACBattery
Power consumption (typical)Known for one6.5 W
AC input voltageKnown for one100 - 240 V
AC input frequencyKnown for one50 - 60 Hz
Input currentKnown for one0.4 A
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WidthKnown for one4 mm
DepthKnown for one220 mm
HeightKnown for one184 mm
WeightDiffers525 g38 g
Width (with stand)Known for one54 mm
Depth (with stand)Known for one220 mm
Height (with stand)Known for one184 mm
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one257 mm
Package depthKnown for one270 mm
Package heightKnown for one92 mm
Package weightKnown for one1.04 kg
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs0 - 40 °C0 - 55 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-20 - 65 °C
System requirementsidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for oneWindows 7 Home Premium, Windows 8, Windows Vista Home Premium, Windows XP Home
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneYes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More digital photo frame comparisons

All digital photo frame comparisons