Product comparison · 2 data projectors

Samsung M220 2200 ANSI lumens LCD XGA (1024x768) vs Sharp XR50S 2700 ANSI lumens DLP SVGA (800x600)

19specifications compared
11differ
8identical
21known for one product only

Key differences

Projector brightness
- M220 2200 ANSI lumens LCD XGA (1024x768):2200 ANSI lumens
- XR50S 2700 ANSI lumens DLP SVGA (800x600):2700 ANSI lumens
Projection technology
- M220 2200 ANSI lumens LCD XGA (1024x768):LCD
- XR50S 2700 ANSI lumens DLP SVGA (800x600):DLP
Projector native resolution
- M220 2200 ANSI lumens LCD XGA (1024x768):XGA (1024x768)
- XR50S 2700 ANSI lumens DLP SVGA (800x600):SVGA (800x600)
Contrast ratio (typical)
- M220 2200 ANSI lumens LCD XGA (1024x768):500:1
- XR50S 2700 ANSI lumens DLP SVGA (800x600):2000:1
Horizontal scan range
- M220 2200 ANSI lumens LCD XGA (1024x768):30 - 80 kHz
- XR50S 2700 ANSI lumens DLP SVGA (800x600):15 - 110 kHz
Vertical scan range
- M220 2200 ANSI lumens LCD XGA (1024x768):56 - 75 Hz
- XR50S 2700 ANSI lumens DLP SVGA (800x600):45 - 85 Hz
Service life of light source
- M220 2200 ANSI lumens LCD XGA (1024x768):3000 h
- XR50S 2700 ANSI lumens DLP SVGA (800x600):4000 h
Lamp power
- M220 2200 ANSI lumens LCD XGA (1024x768):180 W
- XR50S 2700 ANSI lumens DLP SVGA (800x600):210 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of M220, XR50S
40 specifications	A Samsung M220 2200 ANSI lumens LCD XGA (1024x768) Model M220 View product	B Sharp XR50S 2700 ANSI lumens DLP SVGA (800x600) Model XR50S View product
Projector6 differ
Projector brightnessDiffers	2200 ANSI lumens	2700 ANSI lumens
Projection technologyDiffers	LCD	DLP
Projector native resolutionDiffers	XGA (1024x768)	SVGA (800x600)
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs	500:1	2000:1
Screen size compatibilityKnown for one	762 - 7620 mm (30 - 300")	Unknown — not stated by the source
Projection distanceKnown for one	1 - 14 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
Horizontal scan rangeDiffers	30 - 80 kHz	15 - 110 kHz
Vertical scan rangeDiffers	56 - 75 Hz	45 - 85 Hz
Keystone correction, verticalKnown for one	-20 - 20°	Unknown — not stated by the source
Light source2 differ
Service life of light sourceDiffers	3000 h	4000 h
Service life of light source (economic mode)Known for one	5000 h	Unknown — not stated by the source
Lamp typeKnown for one	UHP	Unknown — not stated by the source
Lamp powerDiffers	180 W	210 W
Videoidentical
Analog signal format systemKnown for one	NTSC, PAL, SECAM	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
HDMI ports quantityKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Component video (YPbPr/YCbCr) inKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Composite video inKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
AC (power) inKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
S-Video inputs quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Headphone outputsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Features1 differ
Noise levelDiffers	36 dB	35 dB
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	20 - 80%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers	2.5 kg	2.8 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Remote control includedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other features1 differ
Aspect ratioKnown for one	4:3, 16:9	Unknown — not stated by the source
Connectivity technologyKnown for one	Wired	Unknown — not stated by the source
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs	279 x 229 x 79 mm	300 x 236 x 79 mm
Power supplyKnown for one	240 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
ResolutionKnown for one	1600 x 1200 pixels	Unknown — not stated by the source
Lens systemidentical
FocusKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Manual
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	265 W

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More data projector comparisons

All data projector comparisons