Product comparison · 2 data projectors

Acer PD525D 2600 ANSI lumens DLP XGA (1024x768) vs NEC MultiSync VT58BE orange projector

13specifications compared
10differ
3identical
19known for one product only

Key differences

Projector brightness
- PD525D 2600 ANSI lumens DLP XGA (1024x768):2600 ANSI lumens
- MultiSync VT58BE orange projector:1600 ANSI lumens
Projection technology
- PD525D 2600 ANSI lumens DLP XGA (1024x768):DLP
- MultiSync VT58BE orange projector:LCD
Contrast ratio (typical)
- PD525D 2600 ANSI lumens DLP XGA (1024x768):2000:1
- MultiSync VT58BE orange projector:600:1
Horizontal scan range
- PD525D 2600 ANSI lumens DLP XGA (1024x768):31.5 - 100 kHz
- MultiSync VT58BE orange projector:15 - 100 kHz
Vertical scan range
- PD525D 2600 ANSI lumens DLP XGA (1024x768):56 - 85 Hz
- MultiSync VT58BE orange projector:50 - 120 Hz
Service life of light source
- PD525D 2600 ANSI lumens DLP XGA (1024x768):2000 h
- MultiSync VT58BE orange projector:4000 h
Lamp power
- PD525D 2600 ANSI lumens DLP XGA (1024x768):200 W
- MultiSync VT58BE orange projector:150 W
Power consumption (typical)
- PD525D 2600 ANSI lumens DLP XGA (1024x768):265 W
- MultiSync VT58BE orange projector:215 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of PD525D, MultiSync VT58BE orange projector
32 specifications	A Acer PD525D 2600 ANSI lumens DLP XGA (1024x768) Model PD525D View product	B NEC MultiSync VT58BE orange projector View product
Projector5 differ
Projector brightnessDiffers	2600 ANSI lumens	1600 ANSI lumens
Projection technologyDiffers	DLP	LCD
Projector native resolution	XGA (1024x768)	XGA (1024x768)
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs	2000:1	600:1
Horizontal scan rangeDiffers	31.5 - 100 kHz	15 - 100 kHz
Vertical scan rangeDiffers	56 - 85 Hz	50 - 120 Hz
Projection distanceKnown for one	1.2 - 12.2 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of coloursKnown for one	16.78 million colours	Unknown — not stated by the source
UniformityKnown for one	85%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Light source2 differ
Light source type	Lamp	Lamp
Service life of light sourceDiffers	2000 h	4000 h
Lamp powerDiffers	200 W	150 W
Lamp typeKnown for one	UHP	Unknown — not stated by the source
Multimediaidentical
Number of built-in speakers	1	1
Displayidentical
DisplayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	LCD
Display diagonalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.52 cm (0.6")
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	265 W	215 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	7.4 W
Other features2 differ
OutputKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Mini D-SUB, 15-pin
Audio inputKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 x 3.5 stereo mini jack, 1 x stereo phono jack
Audio outputKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3.5 mm stereo mini jack
Connectivity technologyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Wireless
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs	277 x 237 x 107 mm	112 x 258 x 309 mm
Lens systemKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	F= 1.7 - 2.07, f= 18.9 - 22.7
Power requirementsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100 - 120/200 - 240 V AC/50 - 60 Hz
Video inKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Phono jack
I/O portsDiffers	1 x HDB 15-Pin D-Sub (VGA/Component/HDTV) 1 x 3.5mm Audio Mini Jack 1 x RS232 1 x 29-pin DVI-I 1 x Composite Video RCA 1 x S-Video Mini DIN 1 x 15-Pin D-Sub 1 x USB	1 x Mini D-SUB, 15-pin; DIN 4-pin; D-SUB 8-pin
Aspect ratioKnown for one	4:3, 16:9	Unknown — not stated by the source
Digital keystone correctionKnown for one	+/-16°	Unknown — not stated by the source
Featuresidentical
Noise levelKnown for one	30 dB	Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Market positioningKnown for one	Presentation	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WeightKnown for one	2.4 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More data projector comparisons

All data projector comparisons