Product comparison · 2 data projectors

Acer PD120PD 2000 ANSI lumens DLP XGA (1024x768) vs NEC MultiSync VT58BE orange projector

13specifications compared
10differ
3identical
20known for one product only

Key differences

Projector brightness
- PD120PD 2000 ANSI lumens DLP XGA (1024x768):2000 ANSI lumens
- MultiSync VT58BE orange projector:1600 ANSI lumens
Projection technology
- PD120PD 2000 ANSI lumens DLP XGA (1024x768):DLP
- MultiSync VT58BE orange projector:LCD
Horizontal scan range
- PD120PD 2000 ANSI lumens DLP XGA (1024x768):31.5 - 100 kHz
- MultiSync VT58BE orange projector:15 - 100 kHz
Vertical scan range
- PD120PD 2000 ANSI lumens DLP XGA (1024x768):56 - 85 Hz
- MultiSync VT58BE orange projector:50 - 120 Hz
Service life of light source
- PD120PD 2000 ANSI lumens DLP XGA (1024x768):2000 h
- MultiSync VT58BE orange projector:4000 h
Lamp power
- PD120PD 2000 ANSI lumens DLP XGA (1024x768):200 W
- MultiSync VT58BE orange projector:150 W
Power consumption (typical)
- PD120PD 2000 ANSI lumens DLP XGA (1024x768):253 W
- MultiSync VT58BE orange projector:215 W
Dimensions (WxDxH)
- PD120PD 2000 ANSI lumens DLP XGA (1024x768):230 x 238 x 123 mm
- MultiSync VT58BE orange projector:112 x 258 x 309 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of PD120PD, MultiSync VT58BE orange projector
33 specifications	A Acer PD120PD 2000 ANSI lumens DLP XGA (1024x768) Model PD120PD View product	B NEC MultiSync VT58BE orange projector View product
Projector4 differ
Projector brightnessDiffers	2000 ANSI lumens	1600 ANSI lumens
Projection technologyDiffers	DLP	LCD
Projection distanceKnown for one	1.5 - 12 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
UniformityKnown for one	90%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Horizontal scan rangeDiffers	31.5 - 100 kHz	15 - 100 kHz
Vertical scan rangeDiffers	56 - 85 Hz	50 - 120 Hz
Contrast ratio (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	600:1
Light source2 differ
Service life of light sourceDiffers	2000 h	4000 h
Lamp typeKnown for one	UHP	Unknown — not stated by the source
Lamp powerDiffers	200 W	150 W
Lens systemidentical
Zoom ratioKnown for one	1.2:1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Market positioningKnown for one	Presentation	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	253 W	215 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	7.4 W
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	5 - 35 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WeightKnown for one	2.2 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other features3 differ
Aspect ratioKnown for one	4:3, 16:9	Unknown — not stated by the source
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs	230 x 238 x 123 mm	112 x 258 x 309 mm
Power requirementsDiffers	AC 100 - 240V	100 - 120/200 - 240 V AC/50 - 60 Hz
ResolutionKnown for one	1280 x 1024 pixels	Unknown — not stated by the source
Digital keystone correctionKnown for one	+/-16°	Unknown — not stated by the source
I/O portsDiffers	1 x HDB 15-Pin D-Sub (VGA/Component/HDTV) 1 x Composite Video RCA 1 x S-Video Mini DIN 1 x 3.5mm Audio Mini 1 x 29 pin DVI-I 1 x 15 Pin D-Sub 1 x USB	1 x Mini D-SUB, 15-pin; DIN 4-pin; D-SUB 8-pin
OutputKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Mini D-SUB, 15-pin
Audio inputKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 x 3.5 stereo mini jack, 1 x stereo phono jack
Audio outputKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3.5 mm stereo mini jack
Connectivity technologyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Wireless
Lens systemKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	F= 1.7 - 2.07, f= 18.9 - 22.7
Video inKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Phono jack
Displayidentical
DisplayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	LCD
Display diagonalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.52 cm (0.6")

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More data projector comparisons

All data projector comparisons