Product comparison · 2 data projectors

Acer K10 Standard throw projector 100 ANSI lumens DLP SVGA (858x600) vs Canon XEED SX800

16specifications compared
15differ
1identical
20known for one product only

Key differences

Projector brightness
- K10 Standard throw projector 100 ANSI lumens DLP SVGA (858x600):100 ANSI lumens
- XEED SX800:3000 ANSI lumens
Projection technology
- K10 Standard throw projector 100 ANSI lumens DLP SVGA (858x600):DLP
- XEED SX800:LCOS
Contrast ratio (typical)
- K10 Standard throw projector 100 ANSI lumens DLP SVGA (858x600):2000:1
- XEED SX800:900:1
Horizontal scan range
- K10 Standard throw projector 100 ANSI lumens DLP SVGA (858x600):31 - 69 kHz
- XEED SX800:15 - 75 kHz
Vertical scan range
- K10 Standard throw projector 100 ANSI lumens DLP SVGA (858x600):56 - 85 Hz
- XEED SX800:50 - 85 Hz
Keystone correction, vertical
- K10 Standard throw projector 100 ANSI lumens DLP SVGA (858x600):±40°
- XEED SX800:-20/20°
Light source type
- K10 Standard throw projector 100 ANSI lumens DLP SVGA (858x600):LED
- XEED SX800:Lamp
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantity
- K10 Standard throw projector 100 ANSI lumens DLP SVGA (858x600):1
- XEED SX800:2

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of K10, XEED SX800
36 specifications	A Acer K10 Standard throw projector 100 ANSI lumens DLP SVGA (858x600) Model K10 View product	B Canon XEED SX800 View product
Projector7 differ
Projector brightnessDiffers	100 ANSI lumens	3000 ANSI lumens
Projection technologyDiffers	DLP	LCOS
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs	2000:1	900:1
Screen size compatibilityDiffers	9.65 - 38.6 mm (0.38 - 1.52")	1016 - 7620 mm (40 - 300")
Projection distanceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.2/9.1
UniformityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	88%
Horizontal scan rangeDiffers	31 - 69 kHz	15 - 75 kHz
Vertical scan rangeDiffers	56 - 85 Hz	50 - 85 Hz
Keystone correction, verticalDiffers	±40°	-20/20°
Projector native resolutionKnown for one	SVGA (858x600)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of coloursKnown for one	16.78 million colours	Unknown — not stated by the source
Light source1 differ
Light source typeDiffers	LED	Lamp
Lamp typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	NSH
Lamp powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	230 W
Service life of light sourceKnown for one	20000 h	Unknown — not stated by the source
Lens systemidentical
Focal length rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	16.6 - 24.8 mm
Ports & interfaces1 differ
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantityDiffers	1	2
Composite video in	1	1
Audio (L/R) inKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3
Audio (L/R) outKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Serial interface typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	RS-232
Features1 differ
Noise levelDiffers	28 dB	35 dB
Dot clock scanning frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	170 MHz
Multimediaidentical
RMS rated powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 W
Power2 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	55 W	320 W
Power consumption (standby)Differs	1 W	8 W
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 - 35 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-30 - 60 °C
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers	550 g	5 kg
Other features2 differ
Aspect ratioDiffers	4:3, 16:9	4:3
Connectivity technologyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Wired
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs	127 x 122 x 48.5 mm	332 x 340 x 121 mm
Lens focal rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	F1.95 - F2.6
Power requirementsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100V - 240V AC, 50/60Hz
RS-232 portsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Designidentical
Product typeKnown for one	Standard throw projector	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More data projector comparisons

All data projector comparisons