Product comparison · 2 cpus

HP Intel Celeron E1400 vs HP Intel Pentium T4200

22specifications compared
9differ
13identical
10known for one product only

Key differences

The HP Intel Celeron E1400 has 20 nm more processor lithography than the HP Intel Pentium T4200 (65 nm vs 45 nm). The HP Intel Pentium T4200 has 0.488 MB more processor cache than the HP Intel Celeron E1400 (1 MB vs 0.512 MB). The HP Intel Celeron E1400 has 30 W more thermal Design Power (TDP) than the HP Intel Pentium T4200 (65 W vs 35 W). Processor family: Intel® Celeron® on the HP Intel Celeron E1400, Intel® Pentium® on the HP Intel Pentium T4200. Processor model: E1400 on the HP Intel Celeron E1400, T4200 on the HP Intel Pentium T4200.

Processor family
- Intel Celeron E1400:Intel® Celeron®
- Intel Pentium T4200:Intel® Pentium®
Processor model
- Intel Celeron E1400:E1400
- Intel Pentium T4200:T4200
Processor socket
- Intel Celeron E1400:LGA 775 (Socket T)
- Intel Pentium T4200:Socket 478
Processor lithography
- Intel Celeron E1400:65 nm
- Intel Pentium T4200:45 nm
Processor cache
- Intel Celeron E1400:0.512 MB
- Intel Pentium T4200:1 MB
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
- Intel Celeron E1400:65 W
- Intel Pentium T4200:35 W
Stepping
- Intel Celeron E1400:M0
- Intel Pentium T4200:R0
Number of Processing Die Transistors
- Intel Celeron E1400:105 M
- Intel Pentium T4200:410 M

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Intel Celeron E1400, Intel Pentium T4200
32 specifications	A HP Intel Celeron E1400 View product	B HP Intel Pentium T4200 View product
Processor7 differ
Processor familyDiffers	Intel® Celeron®	Intel® Pentium®
Processor modelDiffers	E1400	T4200
Processor base frequency	2 GHz	2 GHz
Processor cores	2	2
Processor socketDiffers	LGA 775 (Socket T)	Socket 478
Processor lithographyDiffers	65 nm	45 nm
Package typeKnown for one	Tray	Unknown — not stated by the source
Processor operating modes	64-bit	64-bit
Processor cacheDiffers	0.512 MB	1 MB
Processor cache type	L2	L2
Processor front side bus	800 MHz	800 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)Differs	65 W	35 W
SteppingDiffers	M0	R0
Component forKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	PC
FSB ParityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Features2 differ
Execute Disable Bit	Yes	Yes
Idle StatesKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Thermal Monitoring TechnologiesKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of Processing Die TransistorsDiffers	105 M	410 M
Processing Die sizeDiffers	77 mm²	107 mm²
Embedded options available	No	No
Market segmentKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Desktop
Processor special featuresidentical
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology	Yes	Yes
Intel Trusted Execution Technology	No	No
Intel® AES New Instructions (Intel® AES-NI)Known for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Intel® Hyper Threading Technology (Intel® HT Technology)	No	No
Intel® Turbo Boost Technology	No	No
Intel Demand Based Switching	No	No
Operational conditionsidentical
TcaseKnown for one	73.3 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
TjunctionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	105 °C
Other featuresidentical
Intel® Virtualization Technology (Intel® VT)	No	No
Graphicsidentical
On-board graphics cardKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More cpu comparisons

All cpu comparisons