Product comparison · 2 cpus

HP Intel Celeron 530 vs HP Intel Core 2 Duo E8300

Add a product
  • 24specifications compared
  • 16differ
  • 8identical
  • 12known for one product only

Key differences

The HP Intel Core 2 Duo E8300 has 1.1 GHz more processor base frequency than the HP Intel Celeron 530 (2.83 GHz vs 1.73 GHz). The HP Intel Core 2 Duo E8300 has 1 more processor cores than the HP Intel Celeron 530 (2 vs 1). The HP Intel Celeron 530 has 20 nm more processor lithography than the HP Intel Core 2 Duo E8300 (65 nm vs 45 nm). Only the HP Intel Core 2 Duo E8300 has idle States. Only the HP Intel Core 2 Duo E8300 has enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology.

  • Processor family
    • Intel Celeron 530:Intel® Celeron®
    • Intel Core 2 Duo E8300:Intel® Core™2 Duo
  • Processor model
    • Intel Celeron 530:530
    • Intel Core 2 Duo E8300:E8300
  • Processor base frequency
    • Intel Celeron 530:1.73 GHz
    • Intel Core 2 Duo E8300:2.83 GHz
  • Processor cores
    • Intel Celeron 530:1
    • Intel Core 2 Duo E8300:2
  • Processor socket
    • Intel Celeron 530:Socket 478
    • Intel Core 2 Duo E8300:LGA 775 (Socket T)
  • Processor lithography
    • Intel Celeron 530:65 nm
    • Intel Core 2 Duo E8300:45 nm
  • Processor cache
    • Intel Celeron 530:1 MB
    • Intel Core 2 Duo E8300:6 MB
  • Processor front side bus
    • Intel Celeron 530:533 MHz
    • Intel Core 2 Duo E8300:1333 MHz

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of Intel Celeron 530, Intel Core 2 Duo E8300
36 specifications
Processor9 differ
Processor familyDiffersIntel® Celeron®Intel® Core™2 Duo
Processor modelDiffers530E8300
Processor base frequencyDiffers1.73 GHz2.83 GHz
Processor coresDiffers12
Processor socketDiffersSocket 478LGA 775 (Socket T)
Processor lithographyDiffers65 nm45 nm
Component forKnown for oneLaptopUnknown — not stated by the source
Processor operating modes64-bit64-bit
Processor cacheDiffers1 MB6 MB
Processor cache typeL2L2
Processor front side busDiffers533 MHz1333 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)Differs27 W65 W
VID Voltage RangeKnown for one0.95 - 1.30 VUnknown — not stated by the source
FSB ParityNoNo
Package typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceTray
SteppingKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceC0
Graphicsidentical
On-board graphics cardKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Features3 differ
Execute Disable BitYesYes
Idle StatesDiffersNoYes
Market segmentKnown for oneMobileUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of Processing Die TransistorsDiffers291 M410 M
Processing Die sizeDiffers143 mm²107 mm²
Embedded options availableNoNo
Thermal Monitoring TechnologiesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Processor special features2 differ
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep TechnologyDiffersNoYes
Intel Trusted Execution TechnologyDiffersNoYes
Intel® Hyper Threading Technology (Intel® HT Technology)NoNo
Intel® Turbo Boost TechnologyNoNo
Intel Demand Based SwitchingNoNo
Intel® AES New Instructions (Intel® AES-NI)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Intel Virtualization Technology (VT-x)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Intel Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Operational conditions1 differ
TcaseDiffers100 °C72.4 °C
TjunctionKnown for one100 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
Processor package sizeKnown for one35 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Other features1 differ
Intel® Virtualization Technology (Intel® VT)DiffersNoVT-d, VT-x

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More cpu comparisons

All cpu comparisons