Product comparison · 2 cpus

Fujitsu Intel Xeon E5-2650 8C/16T 2.00 GHz 20 MB vs HP Intel Xeon E5-2665 2.4GHz

Add a product
  • 39specifications compared
  • 5differ
  • 34identical
  • 9known for one product only

Key differences

The HP Intel Xeon E5-2665 2.4GHz has 0.4 GHz more processor base frequency than the Fujitsu Intel Xeon E5-2650 8C/16T 2.00 GHz 20 MB (2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The HP Intel Xeon E5-2665 2.4GHz has 0.3 GHz more processor boost frequency than the Fujitsu Intel Xeon E5-2650 8C/16T 2.00 GHz 20 MB (3.1 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The HP Intel Xeon E5-2665 2.4GHz has 20 W more thermal Design Power (TDP) than the Fujitsu Intel Xeon E5-2650 8C/16T 2.00 GHz 20 MB (115 W vs 95 W). Processor model: E5-2650 on the Fujitsu Intel Xeon E5-2650 8C/16T 2.00 GHz 20 MB, E5-2665 on the HP Intel Xeon E5-2665 2.4GHz.

  • Processor model
    • Intel Xeon E5-2650 8C/16T 2.00 GHz 20 MB:E5-2650
    • Intel Xeon E5-2665 2.4GHz:E5-2665
  • Processor base frequency
    • Intel Xeon E5-2650 8C/16T 2.00 GHz 20 MB:2 GHz
    • Intel Xeon E5-2665 2.4GHz:2.4 GHz
  • Processor boost frequency
    • Intel Xeon E5-2650 8C/16T 2.00 GHz 20 MB:2.8 GHz
    • Intel Xeon E5-2665 2.4GHz:3.1 GHz
  • Thermal Design Power (TDP)
    • Intel Xeon E5-2650 8C/16T 2.00 GHz 20 MB:95 W
    • Intel Xeon E5-2665 2.4GHz:115 W
  • Tcase
    • Intel Xeon E5-2650 8C/16T 2.00 GHz 20 MB:77.4 °C
    • Intel Xeon E5-2665 2.4GHz:81.8 °C

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of Intel Xeon E5-2650 8C/16T 2.00 GHz 20 MB, Intel Xeon E5-2665 2.4GHz
48 specifications
Processor4 differ
Processor familyIntel® Xeon® E5 FamilyIntel® Xeon® E5 Family
Processor modelDiffersE5-2650E5-2665
Processor base frequencyDiffers2 GHz2.4 GHz
Processor cores88
Processor socketLGA 2011 (Socket R)LGA 2011 (Socket R)
Processor lithography32 nm32 nm
Component forKnown for oneServer/workstationUnknown — not stated by the source
Processor threads1616
System bus rate8 GT/s8 GT/s
Processor operating modes64-bit64-bit
Processor boost frequencyDiffers2.8 GHz3.1 GHz
Processor front side busKnown for one1600 MHzUnknown — not stated by the source
Thermal Design Power (TDP)Differs95 W115 W
VID Voltage Range0.60 - 1.35 V0.60 - 1.35 V
Bus typeQPIQPI
CPU multiplier (bus/core ratio)Known for one28Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of QPI links22
Memory bandwidth supported by processor (max)51.2 GB/s51.2 GB/s
Memoryidentical
Maximum internal memory supported by processor750 GB750 GB
Memory types supported by processorDDR3-SDRAMDDR3-SDRAM
Memory clock speeds supported by processor800,1066,1333,1600 MHz800,1066,1333,1600 MHz
Memory channelsQuad-channelQuad-channel
ECCYesYes
Graphicsidentical
On-board graphics cardKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Featuresidentical
Execute Disable BitYesYes
Idle StatesYesYes
Thermal Monitoring TechnologiesYesYes
Market segmentKnown for oneServerUnknown — not stated by the source
Maximum number of PCI Express lanesKnown for one40Unknown — not stated by the source
PCI Express slots version3.03.0
CPU configuration (max)22
Embedded options availableKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
ScalabilityS2SS2S
Supported instruction setsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAVX
Processor special featuresidentical
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep TechnologyYesYes
Intel Flex Memory AccessYesYes
Intel Trusted Execution TechnologyYesYes
Intel® AES New Instructions (Intel® AES-NI)YesYes
Intel® Hyper Threading Technology (Intel® HT Technology)YesYes
Intel® Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Intel Demand Based SwitchingYesYes
Intel VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)YesYes
Intel Virtualization Technology (VT-x)YesYes
Intel Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)YesYes
Intel® vPro™ Platform EligibilityYesYes
Operational conditions1 differ
TcaseDiffers77.4 °C81.8 °C
Other featuresidentical
Intel® Virtualization Technology (Intel® VT)VT-d, VT-xVT-d, VT-x
CompatibilityKnown for oneFujitsu Primergy RX200 S7Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More cpu comparisons

All cpu comparisons