Product comparison · 2 cpus

Fujitsu Dual-Core AMD Opteron 290 vs Fujitsu Quad-Core AMD Opteron 2384

11specifications compared
4differ
7identical
1known for one product only

Key differences

Processor base frequency
- Dual-Core AMD Opteron 290:2.8 GHz
- Quad-Core AMD Opteron 2384:2.7 GHz
Processor socket
- Dual-Core AMD Opteron 290:Socket 940
- Quad-Core AMD Opteron 2384:Socket F (1207)
Processor lithography
- Dual-Core AMD Opteron 290:90 nm
- Quad-Core AMD Opteron 2384:65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
- Dual-Core AMD Opteron 290:95 W
- Quad-Core AMD Opteron 2384:115 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Dual-Core AMD Opteron 290, Quad-Core AMD Opteron 2384
12 specifications	A Fujitsu Dual-Core AMD Opteron 290 View product	B Fujitsu Quad-Core AMD Opteron 2384 View product
Processor4 differ
Processor family	AMD Opteron	AMD Opteron
Processor modelKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2384
Processor base frequencyDiffers	2.8 GHz	2.7 GHz
Processor cores	2	2
Processor socketDiffers	Socket 940	Socket F (1207)
Processor lithographyDiffers	90 nm	65 nm
Package type	Tray	Tray
Processor operating modes	64-bit	64-bit
Processor cache	2 MB	2 MB
Processor cache type	L2	L2
Processor front side bus	1000 MHz	1000 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)Differs	95 W	115 W

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More cpu comparisons

All cpu comparisons