Product comparison · 2 cpus

Acer Xeon 5160 vs Fujitsu XEON DP 2.8GHz

8specifications compared
5differ
3identical
5known for one product only

Key differences

The Acer Xeon 5160 has 0.2 GHz more processor base frequency than the Fujitsu XEON DP 2.8GHz (3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Acer Xeon 5160 has 2 MB more processor cache than the Fujitsu XEON DP 2.8GHz (4 MB vs 2 MB). The Acer Xeon 5160 has 533 MHz more processor front side bus than the Fujitsu XEON DP 2.8GHz (1333 MHz vs 800 MHz). Processor family: Intel® Xeon® 5000 Sequence on the Acer Xeon 5160, Intel® Xeon® on the Fujitsu XEON DP 2.8GHz. Package type: Tray on the Acer Xeon 5160, Box on the Fujitsu XEON DP 2.8GHz.

Processor family
- Xeon 5160:Intel® Xeon® 5000 Sequence
- XEON DP 2.8GHz:Intel® Xeon®
Processor base frequency
- Xeon 5160:3 GHz
- XEON DP 2.8GHz:2.8 GHz
Package type
- Xeon 5160:Tray
- XEON DP 2.8GHz:Box
Processor cache
- Xeon 5160:4 MB
- XEON DP 2.8GHz:2 MB
Processor front side bus
- Xeon 5160:1333 MHz
- XEON DP 2.8GHz:800 MHz

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Xeon 5160, XEON DP 2.8GHz
13 specifications	A Acer Xeon 5160 View product	B Fujitsu XEON DP 2.8GHz View product
Processor5 differ
Processor familyDiffers	Intel® Xeon® 5000 Sequence	Intel® Xeon®
Processor modelKnown for one	5160	Unknown — not stated by the source
Processor base frequencyDiffers	3 GHz	2.8 GHz
Processor socketKnown for one	LGA 771 (Socket J)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Processor lithographyKnown for one	65 nm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package typeDiffers	Tray	Box
Processor cacheDiffers	4 MB	2 MB
Processor front side busDiffers	1333 MHz	800 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)Known for one	80 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Processor system typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	DP

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More cpu comparisons

All cpu comparisons