Product comparison · 2 copiers

Kyocera KM-1620 Digital A3 Copier vs Ricoh Aficio MP 161

14specifications compared
10differ
4identical
18known for one product only

Key differences

The Kyocera KM-1620 Digital A3 Copier has 10 s more warm-up time than the Ricoh Aficio MP 161 (20 s vs 10 s). The Ricoh Aficio MP 161 has 1.6 s more time to first page (black, normal) than the Kyocera KM-1620 Digital A3 Copier (7.5 s vs 5.9 s). The Kyocera KM-1620 Digital A3 Copier has 16 MB more internal memory than the Ricoh Aficio MP 161 (32 MB vs 16 MB). Maximum copy speed: No on the Kyocera KM-1620 Digital A3 Copier, 99 cpm on the Ricoh Aficio MP 161. Zoom capability: 50 - 200% on the Kyocera KM-1620 Digital A3 Copier, 50-200% on the Ricoh Aficio MP 161.

Maximum copy speed
- KM-1620 Digital A3 Copier:No
- Aficio MP 161:99 cpm
Zoom capability
- KM-1620 Digital A3 Copier:50 - 200%
- Aficio MP 161:50-200%
Maximum print size
- KM-1620 Digital A3 Copier:A3 (297 x 420 mm)
- Aficio MP 161:A4 (210 x 297 mm)
Warm-up time
- KM-1620 Digital A3 Copier:20 s
- Aficio MP 161:10 s
Time to first page (black, normal)
- KM-1620 Digital A3 Copier:5.9 s
- Aficio MP 161:7.5 s
Internal memory
- KM-1620 Digital A3 Copier:32 MB
- Aficio MP 161:16 MB
Power consumption (standby)
- KM-1620 Digital A3 Copier:88 W
- Aficio MP 161:25 W
Standard input capacity
- KM-1620 Digital A3 Copier:300 sheets
- Aficio MP 161:250 sheets

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of KM-1620 Digital A3 Copier, Aficio MP 161
32 specifications	A Kyocera KM-1620 Digital A3 Copier View product	B Ricoh Aficio MP 161 View product
Copying2 differ
Maximum copy speedDiffers	No	99 cpm
Maximum number of copiesKnown for one	250 copies	Unknown — not stated by the source
Zoom capabilityDiffers	50 - 200%	50-200%
Media formats1 differ
Maximum print sizeDiffers	A3 (297 x 420 mm)	A4 (210 x 297 mm)
Custom media sizesKnown for one	(98x147) - (297x432) mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Standard media sizesKnown for one	A3, A4, A5, Ledger, Letter, Legal, Folio	Unknown — not stated by the source
Media types supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	A6, A5, A4
Print qualityidentical
Greyscale levelsKnown for one	256	Unknown — not stated by the source
Printing2 differ
Warm-up timeDiffers	20 s	10 s
Time to first page (black, normal)Differs	5.9 s	7.5 s
Print speed (black, normal quality, A4/US Letter)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	16 ppm
Print technologyidentical
Number of print cartridgesKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Memory1 differ
Internal memoryDiffers	32 MB	16 MB
Consumablesidentical
Compatible ink types, suppliesKnown for one	TK-410	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power requirementsKnown for one	220-240V, 50/60 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (standby)Differs	88 W	25 W
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	356 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power supplyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	900 W
Sound emissionidentical
Acoustic pressure emissionsKnown for one	65 dB	Unknown — not stated by the source
Certificatesidentical
CertificationKnown for one	GS / TUV / CE / ISO 9001 / ISO 14001	Unknown — not stated by the source
Input & output capacity1 differ
Maximum output capacityKnown for one	250 sheets	Unknown — not stated by the source
Standard input capacityDiffers	300 sheets	250 sheets
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers	39 kg	22 kg
Other features1 differ
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs	574 x 552 x 502 mm	485 x 450 x 371 mm
Media weightidentical
Recommended media weightKnown for one	45 - 160 g/m²	Unknown — not stated by the source
Paper handlingidentical
Maximum capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	850 sheets
Scanningidentical
Colour scanningKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Faxidentical
Fax integratedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More copier comparisons

All copier comparisons