Product comparison · 2 copiers

Canon LaserBase FC100 Analog copier A4 (210 x vs Kyocera Workgroup KM-1635

12specifications compared
9differ
3identical
14known for one product only

Key differences

The Canon LaserBase FC100 Analog copier A4 (210 x has 16.1 s more time to first page (black, normal) than the Kyocera Workgroup KM-1635 (22 s vs 5.9 s). The Kyocera Workgroup KM-1635 has 102.6 W more power consumption (standby) than the Canon LaserBase FC100 Analog copier A4 (210 x (104 W vs 1.4 W). The Canon LaserBase FC100 Analog copier A4 (210 x has 139 W more power consumption (typical) than the Kyocera Workgroup KM-1635 (600 W vs 461 W). Maximum print size: A4 (210 x 297 mm) on the Canon LaserBase FC100 Analog copier A4 (210 x, A3 (297 x 420 mm) on the Kyocera Workgroup KM-1635. Internal memory: No on the Canon LaserBase FC100 Analog copier A4 (210 x, 32 MB on the Kyocera Workgroup KM-1635.

Maximum print size
- LaserBase FC100 Analog copier A4 (210 x:A4 (210 x 297 mm)
- Workgroup KM-1635:A3 (297 x 420 mm)
Time to first page (black, normal)
- LaserBase FC100 Analog copier A4 (210 x:22 s
- Workgroup KM-1635:5.9 s
Internal memory
- LaserBase FC100 Analog copier A4 (210 x:No
- Workgroup KM-1635:32 MB
Power requirements
- LaserBase FC100 Analog copier A4 (210 x:220 - 240V; 50Hz AC
- Workgroup KM-1635:AC 220 ~ 240V, 50/60Hz
Power consumption (standby)
- LaserBase FC100 Analog copier A4 (210 x:1.4 W
- Workgroup KM-1635:104 W
Power consumption (typical)
- LaserBase FC100 Analog copier A4 (210 x:600 W
- Workgroup KM-1635:461 W
Weight
- LaserBase FC100 Analog copier A4 (210 x:8.5 kg
- Workgroup KM-1635:39 kg
Dimensions (WxDxH)
- LaserBase FC100 Analog copier A4 (210 x:359 x 439 x 115 mm
- Workgroup KM-1635:574 x 552 x 502 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of FC100, Workgroup KM-1635
26 specifications	A Canon LaserBase FC100 Analog copier A4 (210 x Model FC100 View product	B Kyocera Workgroup KM-1635 View product
Copyingidentical
Copy speed (black, normal quality, A4)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	16 cpm
Maximum copy speedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	16 cpm
Zoom capabilityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	25-400%
Colouridentical
Colour	No	No
Media formats1 differ
Maximum print sizeDiffers	A4 (210 x 297 mm)	A3 (297 x 420 mm)
Media types supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	A3, A4, A5, Ledger, Letter, Legal, Folio
Standard media sizesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	98 x 147mm ~ 297 x 432mm
Paper handlingidentical
Maximum capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.250 sheets
Printing1 differ
Warm-up time	20 s	20 s
Time to first page (black, normal)Differs	22 s	5.9 s
Print technologyidentical
Print technology	Laser	Laser
Number of print cartridgesKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
Standard interfacesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	USB 2.0
Processoridentical
Built-in processorKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	ARM 946-S 150MHz, FlexRISC (opt)
Memory1 differ
Internal memoryDiffers	No	32 MB
Power3 differ
Power requirementsDiffers	220 - 240V; 50Hz AC	AC 220 ~ 240V, 50/60Hz
Power consumption (standby)Differs	1.4 W	104 W
Power consumption (typical)Differs	600 W	461 W
Certificatesidentical
CertificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	TÜV/GS, CE
Input & output capacityidentical
Maximum output capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	250 sheets
Standard input capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	300 sheets
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers	8.5 kg	39 kg
Other features1 differ
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs	359 x 439 x 115 mm	574 x 552 x 502 mm
Technical details1 differ
TypeDiffers	Analog copier	Digital copier
Faxidentical
Fax integratedKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Media typesidentical
LabelsKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More copier comparisons

All copier comparisons