Product comparison · 2 cooking food processors

Kenwood CCL50.A0CP cooking food processor vs WMF AVANTGARDE 1550 W 3 L Black, Stainless steel

Add a product
  • 14specifications compared
  • 7differ
  • 7identical
  • 22known for one product only

Key differences

The Kenwood CCL50.A0CP cooking food processor has 1.5 L more bowl capacity than the WMF AVANTGARDE 1550 W 3 L Black, Stainless steel (4.5 L vs 3 L). The WMF AVANTGARDE 1550 W 3 L Black, Stainless steel has 9 more speeds than the Kenwood CCL50.A0CP cooking food processor (13 vs 4). The Kenwood CCL50.A0CP cooking food processor has 30°C more cooking temperature (max) than the WMF AVANTGARDE 1550 W 3 L Black, Stainless steel (180 °C vs 150 °C). Product colour: Beige, Stainless steel on the Kenwood CCL50.A0CP cooking food processor, Black, Stainless steel on the WMF AVANTGARDE 1550 W 3 L Black, Stainless steel.

  • Bowl capacity
    • CCL50.A0CP cooking food processor:4.5 L
    • AVANTGARDE 1550 W 3 L Black, Stainless steel:3 L
  • Number of speeds
    • CCL50.A0CP cooking food processor:4
    • AVANTGARDE 1550 W 3 L Black, Stainless steel:13
  • Cooking temperature (max)
    • CCL50.A0CP cooking food processor:180 °C
    • AVANTGARDE 1550 W 3 L Black, Stainless steel:150 °C
  • Number of cooking programs
    • CCL50.A0CP cooking food processor:8
    • AVANTGARDE 1550 W 3 L Black, Stainless steel:14
  • Product colour
    • CCL50.A0CP cooking food processor:Beige, Stainless steel
    • AVANTGARDE 1550 W 3 L Black, Stainless steel:Black, Stainless steel
  • Maximum power
    • CCL50.A0CP cooking food processor:1500 W
    • AVANTGARDE 1550 W 3 L Black, Stainless steel:1550 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of CCL50.A0CP, AVANTGARDE
36 specifications
Features5 differ
Bowl capacityDiffers4.5 L3 L
Variable speedYesYes
Number of speedsDiffers413
Cooking temperature (max)Differs180 °C150 °C
Cooking temperature (min)Known for one30 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of cooking programsDiffers814
Cooking programsDiffersOne pot meal, Knead, Proof, Rinse, Slow cooking, Soup, SteamDessert, Dough, Rinse, Sauce, Soup, Steam
Built-in displayYesYes
Display diagonalKnown for one10.9 cm (4.3")Unknown — not stated by the source
Pulse functionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
TurboKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Built-in scalesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Auto cook functionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
On/off switchKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Dishwasher-proof partsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Applications supportKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Applications supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceWMF Avantgarde
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffersBeige, Stainless steelBlack, Stainless steel
Control typeTouchTouch
Bowl materialStainless steelStainless steel
Housing materialKnown for onePlasticUnknown — not stated by the source
Colour nameKnown for oneChampagneUnknown — not stated by the source
Blade materialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceStainless steel
Power1 differ
Maximum powerDiffers1500 W1550 W
Motor powerKnown for one550 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Heating element powerKnown for one1500 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one460 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one380 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one335 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
WeightKnown for one13.8 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
SpatulaKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
WhiskYesYes
Steaming basketYesYes
Stirring toolYesYes
Number of recipesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source300
Dough toolKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More cooking food processor comparisons

All cooking food processor comparisons