Product comparison · 2 cookers

De’Longhi TGW 965 AB vs Hotpoint CX65SP1 (X) I

18specifications compared
7differ
11identical
18known for one product only

Key differences

Product colour
- TGW 965 AB:White
- CX65SP1 (X) I:Stainless steel
Control type
- TGW 965 AB:Buttons, Rotary
- CX65SP1 (X) I:Rotary
Number of cooking zones
- TGW 965 AB:5 zone(s)
- CX65SP1 (X) I:4 zone(s)
Number of gas cooking zones
- TGW 965 AB:5 zone(s)
- CX65SP1 (X) I:4 zone(s)
Oven power source
- TGW 965 AB:Natural gas
- CX65SP1 (X) I:Electric
Width
- TGW 965 AB:900 mm
- CX65SP1 (X) I:600 mm
Height
- TGW 965 AB:920 mm
- CX65SP1 (X) I:850 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of TGW 965 AB, CX65SP1 (X) I
36 specifications	A De’Longhi TGW 965 AB View product	B Hotpoint CX65SP1 (X) I View product
Design2 differ
Product colourDiffers	White	Stainless steel
Control typeDiffers	Buttons, Rotary	Rotary
Control positionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Front
Hob2 differ
Number of cooking zonesDiffers	5 zone(s)	4 zone(s)
Number of gas cooking zonesDiffers	5 zone(s)	4 zone(s)
Electronic ignitionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Top surface typeKnown for one	Enamel steel	Unknown — not stated by the source
Flame failure deviceKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Oven1 differ
Oven power sourceDiffers	Natural gas	Electric
Total oven(s) interior capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	57 L
Oven net capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	57 L
Oven gross capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	57 L
Oven thermostat rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0 - 250 °C
Number of glass door panelsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2
Number of oven gridsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2
Number of auto cooking programsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	7
Convection cookingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Self-cleaningKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Ergonomicsidentical
Easy to cleanKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Poweridentical
Energy consumption (conventional)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.91 kWh
Energy consumption (forced convection)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.79 kWh
Energy efficiency class (legacy scale)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	A
Weight & dimensions2 differ
WidthDiffers	900 mm	600 mm
HeightDiffers	920 mm	850 mm
Other featuresidentical
Effective tray surface areaKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1150 cm²

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More cooker comparisons

All cooker comparisons