Product comparison · 2 cookers

De’Longhi DEMW 965 B vs Hotpoint CX65SP1 (W) I /HA S

26specifications compared
8differ
18identical
10known for one product only

Key differences

Number of cooking zones
- DEMW 965 B:5 zone(s)
- CX65SP1 (W) I /HA S:4 zone(s)
Number of gas cooking zones
- DEMW 965 B:5 zone(s)
- CX65SP1 (W) I /HA S:4 zone(s)
Oven net capacity
- DEMW 965 B:70 L
- CX65SP1 (W) I /HA S:57 L
Oven gross capacity
- DEMW 965 B:70 L
- CX65SP1 (W) I /HA S:57 L
Number of auto cooking programs
- DEMW 965 B:6
- CX65SP1 (W) I /HA S:7
Energy consumption (conventional)
- DEMW 965 B:1.11 kWh
- CX65SP1 (W) I /HA S:0.91 kWh
Width
- DEMW 965 B:900 mm
- CX65SP1 (W) I /HA S:600 mm
Height
- DEMW 965 B:880 mm
- CX65SP1 (W) I /HA S:850 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of DEMW 965 B, CX65SP1 (W) I /HA S
36 specifications	A De’Longhi DEMW 965 B View product	B Hotpoint CX65SP1 (W) I /HA S View product
Designidentical
Product type	Freestanding cooker	Freestanding cooker
Product colour	White	White
Control type	Rotary	Rotary
Control positionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Front
Built-in display	No	No
Hob2 differ
Hob type	Gas	Gas
Number of cooking zonesDiffers	5 zone(s)	4 zone(s)
Number of gas cooking zonesDiffers	5 zone(s)	4 zone(s)
Electronic ignition	Yes	Yes
Hob cover	Yes	Yes
Oven3 differ
Number of ovens	1	1
Oven power source	Electric	Electric
Total oven(s) interior capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	57 L
Oven net capacityDiffers	70 L	57 L
Oven gross capacityDiffers	70 L	57 L
Grill	Yes	Yes
Oven thermostat rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0 - 250 °C
Number of glass door panelsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2
Number of oven gridsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2
Interior light	Yes	Yes
Number of auto cooking programsDiffers	6	7
Convection cooking	Yes	Yes
Conventional cooking	Yes	Yes
Self-cleaningKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Oven sizeKnown for one	Medium	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Timer	Yes	Yes
Timer type	Mechanical	Mechanical
Easy to clean	Yes	Yes
Power1 differ
Energy consumption (conventional)Differs	1.11 kWh	0.91 kWh
Energy consumption (forced convection)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.79 kWh
Energy efficiency class (legacy scale)	A	A
Weight & dimensions2 differ
WidthDiffers	900 mm	600 mm
Depth	600 mm	600 mm
HeightDiffers	880 mm	850 mm
Bread machineidentical
Bread & dough making programsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Pizza dough
Other featuresidentical
Effective tray surface areaKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1150 cm²

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More cooker comparisons

All cooker comparisons