Product comparison · 2 cookers

Beko CSS 48100 GW vs Candy CCG5100SW/1 Freestanding cooker Gas White

21specifications compared
13differ
8identical
25known for one product only

Key differences

Control type
- CSS 48100 GW:Buttons, Rotary
- CCG5100SW/1 Freestanding cooker Gas White:Rotary
Hob type
- CSS 48100 GW:Ceramic hob
- CCG5100SW/1 Freestanding cooker Gas White:Gas
Number of cooking zones
- CSS 48100 GW:3 zone(s)
- CCG5100SW/1 Freestanding cooker Gas White:4 zone(s)
Number of electric cooking zones
- CSS 48100 GW:3 zone(s)
- CCG5100SW/1 Freestanding cooker Gas White:0 zone(s)
Oven size
- CSS 48100 GW:Medium
- CCG5100SW/1 Freestanding cooker Gas White:Small
Oven power source
- CSS 48100 GW:Electric
- CCG5100SW/1 Freestanding cooker Gas White:Gas
Oven net capacity
- CSS 48100 GW:54 L
- CCG5100SW/1 Freestanding cooker Gas White:40 L
Energy consumption (conventional)
- CSS 48100 GW:0.9 kWh
- CCG5100SW/1 Freestanding cooker Gas White:5.4 MJ

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of CSS 48100 GW, CCG5100SW/1
46 specifications	A Beko CSS 48100 GW View product	B Candy CCG5100SW/1 Freestanding cooker Gas White Model CCG5100SW/1 View product
Design1 differ
Product type	Freestanding cooker	Freestanding cooker
Product colour	White	White
Housing materialKnown for one	Metal	Unknown — not stated by the source
Control typeDiffers	Buttons, Rotary	Rotary
Control position	Front	Front
Built-in display	No	No
Internal coatingKnown for one	Enamel	Unknown — not stated by the source
Handle colourKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	White
Hob3 differ
Hob typeDiffers	Ceramic hob	Gas
Top surface typeKnown for one	Glass-ceramic	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of cooking zonesDiffers	3 zone(s)	4 zone(s)
Number of electric cooking zonesDiffers	3 zone(s)	0 zone(s)
Electronic ignitionKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cooking zone 2 typeKnown for one	Medium	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cooking zone 2 powerKnown for one	211.46 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cooking zone 2 diameterKnown for one	14 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cooking zone 3 typeKnown for one	Large	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cooking zone 3 powerKnown for one	207 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cooking zone 3 diameterKnown for one	18 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of gas cooking zonesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4 zone(s)
Oven3 differ
Oven sizeDiffers	Medium	Small
Number of ovens	1	1
Oven power sourceDiffers	Electric	Gas
Total oven(s) interior capacityKnown for one	54 L	Unknown — not stated by the source
Oven net capacityDiffers	54 L	40 L
Oven gross capacityKnown for one	54 L	Unknown — not stated by the source
GrillKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of glass door panelsKnown for one	2	Unknown — not stated by the source
Removable door glass	Yes	Yes
Number of shelvesKnown for one	2 shelves	Unknown — not stated by the source
Interior lightKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of auto cooking programsKnown for one	4	Unknown — not stated by the source
Convection cookingKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Oven positionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Bottom
Viewing windowKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Ergonomicsidentical
Adjustable feet	Yes	Yes
Power2 differ
AC input voltage	220 - 240 V	220 - 240 V
AC input frequencyKnown for one	50 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Energy consumption (conventional)Differs	0.9 kWh	5.4 MJ
Energy efficiency class (legacy scale)Differs	B	A
Energy efficiency scaleKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	A+++ to D
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	500 mm	505 mm
DepthDiffers	500 mm	600 mm
HeightDiffers	850 mm	870 mm
WeightDiffers	44.7 kg	41 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	44 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More cooker comparisons

All cooker comparisons