Product comparison · 2 cooker hoods

CDA ECN92 Stainless steel 391 m³/h vs CDA ECP102 Black 377 m³/h

15specifications compared
4differ
11identical
3known for one product only

Key differences

The CDA ECN92 Stainless steel 391 m³/h has 14 m³/h more maximum extraction power than the CDA ECP102 Black 377 m³/h (391 m³/h vs 377 m³/h). The CDA ECP102 Black 377 m³/h has 100 mm more width than the CDA ECN92 Stainless steel 391 m³/h (1000 mm vs 900 mm). The CDA ECN92 Stainless steel 391 m³/h has 1 cm more height (min) than the CDA ECP102 Black 377 m³/h (64 cm vs 63 cm). Product colour: Stainless steel on the CDA ECN92 Stainless steel 391 m³/h, Black on the CDA ECP102 Black 377 m³/h.

Maximum extraction power
- ECN92 Stainless steel 391 m³/h:391 m³/h
- ECP102 Black 377 m³/h:377 m³/h
Product colour
- ECN92 Stainless steel 391 m³/h:Stainless steel
- ECP102 Black 377 m³/h:Black
Width
- ECN92 Stainless steel 391 m³/h:900 mm
- ECP102 Black 377 m³/h:1000 mm
Height (min)
- ECN92 Stainless steel 391 m³/h:64 cm
- ECP102 Black 377 m³/h:63 cm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of ECN92, ECP102
18 specifications	A CDA ECN92 Stainless steel 391 m³/h Model ECN92 View product	B CDA ECP102 Black 377 m³/h Model ECP102 View product
Performance1 differ
Maximum extraction powerDiffers	391 m³/h	377 m³/h
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffers	Stainless steel	Black
Built-in displayKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Wi-FiKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Lightingidentical
Bulb powerKnown for one	20 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions2 differ
WidthDiffers	900 mm	1000 mm
Height (min)Differs	64 cm	63 cm

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More cooker hood comparisons

All cooker hood comparisons