Biamp Cambridge QT-100 vs Vivolink VLUSBCPOWER control processor

Key differences

The Biamp Cambridge QT-100 has 74 mm more width than the Vivolink VLUSBCPOWER control processor (179 mm vs 105 mm). The Vivolink VLUSBCPOWER control processor has 107 mm more depth than the Biamp Cambridge QT-100 (130 mm vs 23 mm). The Biamp Cambridge QT-100 has 54 mm more height than the Vivolink VLUSBCPOWER control processor (89 mm vs 35 mm). Only the Biamp Cambridge QT-100 has built-in display. Product colour: Grey, Black on the Biamp Cambridge QT-100, Black on the Vivolink VLUSBCPOWER control processor.

• Product colour
  • Cambridge QT-100:Grey, Black
  • VLUSBCPOWER control processor:Black
• Built-in display
  • Cambridge QT-100:Yes
  • VLUSBCPOWER control processor:No
• AC input voltage
  • Cambridge QT-100:100 - 240 V
  • VLUSBCPOWER control processor:110 - 230 V
• Width
  • Cambridge QT-100:179 mm
  • VLUSBCPOWER control processor:105 mm
• Depth
  • Cambridge QT-100:23 mm
  • VLUSBCPOWER control processor:130 mm
• Height
  • Cambridge QT-100:89 mm
  • VLUSBCPOWER control processor:35 mm
• Weight
  • Cambridge QT-100:170 g
  • VLUSBCPOWER control processor:165 g