Product comparison · 2 control processors

Biamp Cambridge QT-100 vs Vivolink VLUSBCPOWER-H control processor

7specifications compared
7differ
0identical
21known for one product only

Key differences

The Biamp Cambridge QT-100 has 74 mm more width than the Vivolink VLUSBCPOWER-H control processor (179 mm vs 105 mm). The Vivolink VLUSBCPOWER-H control processor has 107 mm more depth than the Biamp Cambridge QT-100 (130 mm vs 23 mm). The Biamp Cambridge QT-100 has 54 mm more height than the Vivolink VLUSBCPOWER-H control processor (89 mm vs 35 mm). Only the Biamp Cambridge QT-100 has built-in display. Product colour: Grey, Black on the Biamp Cambridge QT-100, Black on the Vivolink VLUSBCPOWER-H control processor.

Product colour
- Cambridge QT-100:Grey, Black
- VLUSBCPOWER-H control processor:Black
Built-in display
- Cambridge QT-100:Yes
- VLUSBCPOWER-H control processor:No
AC input voltage
- Cambridge QT-100:100 - 240 V
- VLUSBCPOWER-H control processor:110 - 230 V
Width
- Cambridge QT-100:179 mm
- VLUSBCPOWER-H control processor:105 mm
Depth
- Cambridge QT-100:23 mm
- VLUSBCPOWER-H control processor:130 mm
Height
- Cambridge QT-100:89 mm
- VLUSBCPOWER-H control processor:35 mm
Weight
- Cambridge QT-100:170 g
- VLUSBCPOWER-H control processor:165 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of QT-100, VLUSBCPOWER-H
28 specifications	A Biamp Cambridge QT-100 Model QT-100 View product	B Vivolink VLUSBCPOWER-H control processor Model VLUSBCPOWER-H View product
Features2 differ
Product colourDiffers	Grey, Black	Black
On/off switchKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Reset buttonKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Rack mountingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Built-in displayDiffers	Yes	No
Cooling typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Passive
Input impedanceKnown for one	5000 Ω	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display typeKnown for one	LCD	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB portKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
USB ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2
USB port typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	USB Type-C
IR connectivityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
DC-in jackKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Power1 differ
AC input voltageDiffers	100 - 240 V	110 - 230 V
Power consumption (max)Known for one	7 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
AC input frequencyKnown for one	50/60 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	179 mm	105 mm
DepthDiffers	23 mm	130 mm
HeightDiffers	89 mm	35 mm
WeightDiffers	170 g	165 g
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	105 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	130 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	35 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	200 g
Networkidentical
Ethernet LANKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for one	2	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	4 - 40 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	0 - 95%	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More control processor comparisons

All control processor comparisons