ATEN VK248 control processor vs Biamp Qt X 805

Key differences

The Biamp Qt X 805 has 11 W more power consumption (max) than the ATEN VK248 control processor (24 W vs 13 W). The Biamp Qt X 805 has 295.7 mm more width than the ATEN VK248 control processor (371.5 mm vs 75.8 mm). The ATEN VK248 control processor has 103 mm more depth than the Biamp Qt X 805 (200 mm vs 97 mm). Only the Biamp Qt X 805 has built-in display. Product colour: Black on the ATEN VK248 control processor, Grey on the Biamp Qt X 805.

• Product colour
  • VK248 control processor:Black
  • Qt X 805:Grey
• Built-in display
  • VK248 control processor:No
  • Qt X 805:Yes
• Operating temperature (T-T)
  • VK248 control processor:0 - 50 °C
  • Qt X 805:4 - 40 °C
• Operating relative humidity (H-H)
  • VK248 control processor:0 - 80%
  • Qt X 805:0 - 95%
• Power consumption (max)
  • VK248 control processor:13 W
  • Qt X 805:24 W
• Width
  • VK248 control processor:75.8 mm
  • Qt X 805:371.5 mm
• Depth
  • VK248 control processor:200 mm
  • Qt X 805:97 mm
• Height
  • VK248 control processor:42 mm
  • Qt X 805:89 mm