ATEN VK2100A-AT-E control processor vs Biamp Cambridge QT-100

Key differences

The Biamp Cambridge QT-100 has 1 more Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports than the ATEN VK2100A-AT-E control processor (2 vs 1). The Biamp Cambridge QT-100 has 0.5 W more power consumption (max) than the ATEN VK2100A-AT-E control processor (7 W vs 6.5 W). The Biamp Cambridge QT-100 has 15.8 mm more width than the ATEN VK2100A-AT-E control processor (179 mm vs 163.2 mm). Only the Biamp Cambridge QT-100 has built-in display. Product colour: Black on the ATEN VK2100A-AT-E control processor, Grey, Black on the Biamp Cambridge QT-100.

• Product colour
  • VK2100A-AT-E control processor:Black
  • Cambridge QT-100:Grey, Black
• Built-in display
  • VK2100A-AT-E control processor:No
  • Cambridge QT-100:Yes
• Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports
  • VK2100A-AT-E control processor:1
  • Cambridge QT-100:2
• Operating temperature (T-T)
  • VK2100A-AT-E control processor:0 - 50 °C
  • Cambridge QT-100:4 - 40 °C
• Operating relative humidity (H-H)
  • VK2100A-AT-E control processor:0 - 80%
  • Cambridge QT-100:0 - 95%
• Power consumption (max)
  • VK2100A-AT-E control processor:6.5 W
  • Cambridge QT-100:7 W
• Width
  • VK2100A-AT-E control processor:163.2 mm
  • Cambridge QT-100:179 mm
• Depth
  • VK2100A-AT-E control processor:432.4 mm
  • Cambridge QT-100:23 mm