Product comparison · 2 conference phones

HP Poly Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams Full Radio and PoE-enabled vs Yealink CP925 IP conference phone

20specifications compared
10differ
10identical
29known for one product only

Key differences

The HP Poly Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams Full Radio and PoE-enabled has 1 more RJ-45 ports quantity than the Yealink CP925 IP conference phone (2 vs 1). The HP Poly Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams Full Radio and PoE-enabled has 1 more USB ports quantity than the Yealink CP925 IP conference phone (2 vs 1). The HP Poly Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams Full Radio and PoE-enabled has 98 mm more width than the Yealink CP925 IP conference phone (383 mm vs 285 mm). Display diagonal: 12.7 cm (5") on the HP Poly Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams Full Radio and PoE-enabled, 10.2 cm (4") on the Yealink CP925 IP conference phone. Display resolution: 720 x 1280 pixels on the HP Poly Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams Full Radio and PoE-enabled, 480 x 800 pixels on the Yealink CP925 IP conference phone.

Display diagonal
- Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams Full Radio and PoE-enabled:12.7 cm (5")
- CP925 IP conference phone:10.2 cm (4")
Display resolution
- Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams Full Radio and PoE-enabled:720 x 1280 pixels
- CP925 IP conference phone:480 x 800 pixels
Ethernet LAN data rates
- Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams Full Radio and PoE-enabled:10,1000,100 Mbit/s
- CP925 IP conference phone:10,100 Mbit/s
RJ-45 ports quantity
- Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams Full Radio and PoE-enabled:2
- CP925 IP conference phone:1
USB connector type
- Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams Full Radio and PoE-enabled:Micro-USB B, USB Type-A
- CP925 IP conference phone:USB Type-C
USB ports quantity
- Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams Full Radio and PoE-enabled:2
- CP925 IP conference phone:1
Storage temperature (T-T)
- Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams Full Radio and PoE-enabled:-20 - 70 °C
- CP925 IP conference phone:-10 - 40 °C
Width
- Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams Full Radio and PoE-enabled:383 mm
- CP925 IP conference phone:285 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams Full Radio and PoE-enabled, CP925
49 specifications	A HP Poly Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams Full Radio and PoE-enabled View product	B Yealink CP925 IP conference phone Model CP925 View product
Features3 differ
Product type	IP conference phone	IP conference phone
Product colour	Black	Black
Built-in display	Yes	Yes
Display typeKnown for one	LCD	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display diagonalDiffers	12.7 cm (5")	10.2 cm (4")
Display resolutionDiffers	720 x 1280 pixels	480 x 800 pixels
Touchscreen	Yes	Yes
Voice codecsKnown for one	G.722, G.722.1, G.722.1C, G.729ab, G.711a, G.711u, iLBC, G.719, OPUS	Unknown — not stated by the source
Wi-Fi	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standardsKnown for one	802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth version	4.2	4.2
Ethernet interface typeKnown for one	Gigabit Ethernet	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ethernet LAN data ratesDiffers	10,1000,100 Mbit/s	10,100 Mbit/s
Power over Ethernet (PoE)Known for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Security algorithmsKnown for one	WPA2-Enterprise, EAP-TLS, HTTPS	Unknown — not stated by the source
Built-in speaker(s)	Yes	Yes
Control typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Touch
Frequency rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100 - 20000 Hz
Top Wi-Fi standardKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
Quality of Service (QoS) supportKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Call forwardingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Call recordingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Call holdKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Ports & interfaces3 differ
RJ-45 ports quantityDiffers	2	1
USB port	Yes	Yes
USB version	2.0	2.0
USB connector typeDiffers	Micro-USB B, USB Type-A	USB Type-C
USB ports quantityDiffers	2	1
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesKnown for one	ENERGY STAR	Unknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for one	RoHS, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), CE	Unknown — not stated by the source
Total carbon footprint (kg of CO2e)Known for one	60	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	0 - 40 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage temperature (T-T)Differs	-20 - 70 °C	-10 - 40 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	5 - 95%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 - 90%
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers	383 mm	285 mm
DepthDiffers	75 mm	289.5 mm
HeightDiffers	332 mm	59.1 mm
WeightKnown for one	950 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package widthKnown for one	483 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one	115 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one	394 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one	300 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for one	LAN (RJ-45), USB	Unknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Country of originKnown for one	China, Mexico	Unknown — not stated by the source
Pallet gross weightKnown for one	357 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
UNSPSC-codeKnown for one	43191511	Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	11 W

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More conference phone comparisons

All conference phone comparisons