Product comparison · 2 conference phones

HP Poly Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA vs HP Poly Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams Full Radio and PoE-enabled

36specifications compared
5differ
31identical
8known for one product only

Key differences

The HP Poly Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams Full Radio and PoE-enabled has 284.8 kg more pallet gross weight than the HP Poly Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA (357 kg vs 72.2 kg). Ethernet LAN data rates: 10,100,1000 Mbit/s on the HP Poly Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA, 10,1000,100 Mbit/s on the HP Poly Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams Full Radio and PoE-enabled. Package weight: 2.42 kg on the HP Poly Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA, 300 g on the HP Poly Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams Full Radio and PoE-enabled. Country of origin: Mexico on the HP Poly Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA, China, Mexico on the HP Poly Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams Full Radio and PoE-enabled.

Ethernet LAN data rates
- Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA:10,100,1000 Mbit/s
- Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams Full Radio and PoE-enabled:10,1000,100 Mbit/s
Package weight
- Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA:2.42 kg
- Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams Full Radio and PoE-enabled:300 g
Country of origin
- Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA:Mexico
- Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams Full Radio and PoE-enabled:China, Mexico
Pallet gross weight
- Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA:72.2 kg
- Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams Full Radio and PoE-enabled:357 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA, Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams Full Radio and PoE-enabled
44 specifications	A HP Poly Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA View product	B HP Poly Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams Full Radio and PoE-enabled View product
Features2 differ
Voice codecsDiffers	G.711alaw, G.711ulaw, G.719, G.722, G.722.1, G.722.1C, G.729ab, OPUS, iLBC	G.722, G.722.1, G.722.1C, G.729ab, G.711a, G.711u, iLBC, G.719, OPUS
Number of microphone arraysKnown for one	3	Unknown — not stated by the source
Top Wi-Fi standardKnown for one	Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ethernet LAN data ratesDiffers	10,100,1000 Mbit/s	10,1000,100 Mbit/s
Networking standardsKnown for one	IEEE 802.3af, IEEE 802.3at	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of speakersKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
TouchscreenKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2
Technical detailsidentical
Total carbon footprint (kg of CO2e)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	60
Weight & dimensions1 differ
Package weightDiffers	2.42 kg	300 g
Logistics data2 differ
Country of originDiffers	Mexico	China, Mexico
Pallet gross weightDiffers	72.2 kg	357 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	LAN (RJ-45), USB

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More conference phone comparisons

All conference phone comparisons