Product comparison · 2 conference phones

HP Poly Trio C60 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio vs HP Poly Trio C60 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA

33specifications compared
6differ
27identical
5known for one product only

Key differences

The HP Poly Trio C60 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio has 284.8 kg more pallet gross weight than the HP Poly Trio C60 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA (357 kg vs 72.2 kg). Ethernet LAN data rates: 10,1000,100 Mbit/s on the HP Poly Trio C60 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio, 10,100,1000 Mbit/s on the HP Poly Trio C60 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA. Package weight: 300 g on the HP Poly Trio C60 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio, 2.42 kg on the HP Poly Trio C60 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA. Cables included: LAN (RJ-45), USB on the HP Poly Trio C60 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio, USB on the HP Poly Trio C60 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA. Country of origin: China, Mexico on the HP Poly Trio C60 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio, Mexico on the HP Poly Trio C60 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA.

Ethernet LAN data rates
- Trio C60 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio:10,1000,100 Mbit/s
- Trio C60 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA:10,100,1000 Mbit/s
Package weight
- Trio C60 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio:300 g
- Trio C60 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA:2.42 kg
Cables included
- Trio C60 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio:LAN (RJ-45), USB
- Trio C60 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA:USB
Country of origin
- Trio C60 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio:China, Mexico
- Trio C60 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA:Mexico
Pallet gross weight
- Trio C60 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio:357 kg
- Trio C60 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA:72.2 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Trio C60 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio, Trio C60 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA
38 specifications	A HP Poly Trio C60 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio View product	B HP Poly Trio C60 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA View product
Features2 differ
Voice codecsDiffers	G.722, G.722.1, G.722.1C, G.729ab, G.711a, G.711u, iLBC, G.719, OPUS	G.711alaw, G.711ulaw, G.719, G.722, G.722.1, G.722.1C, G.729ab, OPUS, iLBC
Number of microphone arraysKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3
Ethernet LAN data ratesDiffers	10,1000,100 Mbit/s	10,100,1000 Mbit/s
Networking standardsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	IEEE 802.3af, IEEE 802.3at
Number of speakersKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
TouchscreenKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB ports quantityKnown for one	2	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
Package weightDiffers	300 g	2.42 kg
Packaging content1 differ
Cables includedDiffers	LAN (RJ-45), USB	USB
Logistics data2 differ
Country of originDiffers	China, Mexico	Mexico
Pallet gross weightDiffers	357 kg	72.2 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More conference phone comparisons

All conference phone comparisons