Product comparison · 2 conference phones

HP Poly Trio 8800 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA vs HP Poly Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA

Add a product
  • 39specifications compared
  • 2differ
  • 37identical
  • 3known for one product only

Key differences

The HP Poly Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA has 0.22 kg more package weight than the HP Poly Trio 8800 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA (2.42 kg vs 2.2 kg). The HP Poly Trio 8800 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA has 147.8 kg more pallet gross weight than the HP Poly Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA (220 kg vs 72.2 kg).

  • Package weight
    • Trio 8800 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA:2.2 kg
    • Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA:2.42 kg
  • Pallet gross weight
    • Trio 8800 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA:220 kg
    • Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA:72.2 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of Trio 8800 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA, Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA
42 specifications
Featuresidentical
Display typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceLCD
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB ports quantityKnown for one2Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
Package weightDiffers2.2 kg2.42 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for oneLAN (RJ-45), USBUnknown — not stated by the source
Logistics data1 differ
Pallet gross weightDiffers220 kg72.2 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More conference phone comparisons

All conference phone comparisons