Product comparison · 2 conference phones

HP Poly Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled vs HP Poly Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA

24specifications compared
2differ
22identical
0known for one product only

Key differences

The HP Poly Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled has 189 kg more pallet gross weight than the HP Poly Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA (357 kg vs 168 kg). Package weight: 300 g on the HP Poly Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled, 1.5 kg on the HP Poly Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA.

Package weight
- Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled:300 g
- Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA:1.5 kg
Pallet gross weight
- Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled:357 kg
- Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA:168 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled, Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA
24 specifications	A HP Poly Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled View product	B HP Poly Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA View product
Weight & dimensions1 differ
Package weightDiffers	300 g	1.5 kg
Logistics data1 differ
Pallet gross weightDiffers	357 kg	168 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More conference phone comparisons

All conference phone comparisons