HP Poly Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA vs Yealink CP935W IP conference phone

Key differences

The Yealink CP935W IP conference phone has 3 more microphone arrays than the HP Poly Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA (6 vs 3). The HP Poly Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA has 50.4 mm more width than the Yealink CP935W IP conference phone (339 mm vs 288.6 mm). The HP Poly Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA has 8.8 mm more depth than the Yealink CP935W IP conference phone (294 mm vs 285.2 mm). Security algorithms: WPA2-Enterprise, EAP-TLS, HTTPS on the HP Poly Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA, 256-bit AES, HTTPS, MD5, SRTP, TLS, WPA2 on the Yealink CP935W IP conference phone. Operating temperature (T-T): 0 - 40 °C on the HP Poly Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA, -10 - 40 °C on the Yealink CP935W IP conference phone.

• Number of microphone arrays
  • Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA:3
  • CP935W IP conference phone:6
• Operating temperature (T-T)
  • Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA:0 - 40 °C
  • CP935W IP conference phone:-10 - 40 °C
• Operating relative humidity (H-H)
  • Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA:5 - 95%
  • CP935W IP conference phone:10 - 90%
• Width
  • Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA:339 mm
  • CP935W IP conference phone:288.6 mm
• Depth
  • Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA:294 mm
  • CP935W IP conference phone:285.2 mm
• Height
  • Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA:60 mm
  • CP935W IP conference phone:63.9 mm