Product comparison · 2 conference phones

HP Poly Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA vs HP Poly Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams Full Radio and PoE-enabled

25specifications compared
12differ
13identical
19known for one product only

Key differences

The HP Poly Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams Full Radio and PoE-enabled has 1 more RJ-45 ports quantity than the HP Poly Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA (2 vs 1). The HP Poly Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams Full Radio and PoE-enabled has 44 mm more width than the HP Poly Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA (383 mm vs 339 mm). The HP Poly Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA has 219 mm more depth than the HP Poly Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams Full Radio and PoE-enabled (294 mm vs 75 mm). Display diagonal: 8.89 cm (3.5") on the HP Poly Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA, 12.7 cm (5") on the HP Poly Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams Full Radio and PoE-enabled. Ethernet LAN data rates: 10,100,1000 Mbit/s on the HP Poly Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA, 10,1000,100 Mbit/s on the HP Poly Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams Full Radio and PoE-enabled.

Display diagonal
- Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA:8.89 cm (3.5")
- Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams Full Radio and PoE-enabled:12.7 cm (5")
Ethernet LAN data rates
- Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA:10,100,1000 Mbit/s
- Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams Full Radio and PoE-enabled:10,1000,100 Mbit/s
RJ-45 ports quantity
- Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA:1
- Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams Full Radio and PoE-enabled:2
Width
- Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA:339 mm
- Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams Full Radio and PoE-enabled:383 mm
Depth
- Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA:294 mm
- Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams Full Radio and PoE-enabled:75 mm
Height
- Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA:60 mm
- Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams Full Radio and PoE-enabled:332 mm
Weight
- Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA:735 g
- Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams Full Radio and PoE-enabled:950 g
Package weight
- Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA:1.5 kg
- Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams Full Radio and PoE-enabled:300 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA, Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams Full Radio and PoE-enabled
44 specifications	A HP Poly Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio GSA/TAA View product	B HP Poly Trio C60 IP Conference Phone for Microsoft Teams Full Radio and PoE-enabled View product
Features3 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	8.89 cm (3.5")	12.7 cm (5")
Display resolutionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	720 x 1280 pixels
TouchscreenKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Voice codecsDiffers	G.711alaw, G.711ulaw, G.719, G.722, G.722.1, G.722.1C, G.729ab, OPUS, iLBC	G.722, G.722.1, G.722.1C, G.729ab, G.711a, G.711u, iLBC, G.719, OPUS
Wi-FiKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Wi-Fi standardsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
BluetoothKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Bluetooth versionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4.2
Ethernet LAN data ratesDiffers	10,100,1000 Mbit/s	10,1000,100 Mbit/s
Number of microphone arraysKnown for one	3	Unknown — not stated by the source
Networking standardsKnown for one	IEEE 802.3af	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of speakersKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces1 differ
RJ-45 ports quantityDiffers	1	2
USB portKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
USB versionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2.0
USB connector typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Micro-USB B, USB Type-A
USB ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2
Technical details1 differ
Compliance certificatesDiffers	RoHS, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), CE, BSMI	RoHS, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), CE
Total carbon footprint (kg of CO2e)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	60
Weight & dimensions5 differ
WidthDiffers	339 mm	383 mm
DepthDiffers	294 mm	75 mm
HeightDiffers	60 mm	332 mm
WeightDiffers	735 g	950 g
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	483 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	115 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	394 mm
Package weightDiffers	1.5 kg	300 g
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	LAN (RJ-45), USB
Ethernet cableKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Logistics data2 differ
Country of originDiffers	Laos	China, Mexico
Pallet gross weightDiffers	168 kg	357 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More conference phone comparisons

All conference phone comparisons