Product comparison · 2 conference phones

HP Poly Poly Trio C60 vs HP Poly Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio

Add a product
  • 26specifications compared
  • 10differ
  • 16identical
  • 17known for one product only

Key differences

The HP Poly Poly Trio C60 has 1 more RJ-45 ports quantity than the HP Poly Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio (2 vs 1). The HP Poly Poly Trio C60 has 44 mm more width than the HP Poly Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio (383 mm vs 339 mm). The HP Poly Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio has 219 mm more depth than the HP Poly Poly Trio C60 (294 mm vs 75 mm). Display diagonal: 12.7 cm (5") on the HP Poly Poly Trio C60, 8.89 cm (3.5") on the HP Poly Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio. Country of origin: China, Mexico on the HP Poly Poly Trio C60, Laos on the HP Poly Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio.

  • Display diagonal
    • Poly Trio C60:12.7 cm (5")
    • Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio:8.89 cm (3.5")
  • RJ-45 ports quantity
    • Poly Trio C60:2
    • Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio:1
  • Width
    • Poly Trio C60:383 mm
    • Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio:339 mm
  • Depth
    • Poly Trio C60:75 mm
    • Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio:294 mm
  • Height
    • Poly Trio C60:332 mm
    • Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio:60 mm
  • Weight
    • Poly Trio C60:950 g
    • Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio:735 g
  • Country of origin
    • Poly Trio C60:China, Mexico
    • Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio:Laos

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of Poly Trio C60, Trio 8300 IP Conference Phone and PoE-enabled No Radio
43 specifications
Features3 differ
Display diagonalDiffers12.7 cm (5")8.89 cm (3.5")
Display resolutionKnown for one720 x 1280 pixelsUnknown — not stated by the source
Voice codecsDiffersG.711, G.719, G.722, G.722.1, G.722.1C, G.729ab, OPUS, iLBCG.711alaw, G.711ulaw, G.719, G.722, G.722.1, G.722.1C, G.729ab, OPUS, iLBC
Wi-FiKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Top Wi-Fi standardKnown for oneWi-Fi 4 (802.11n)Unknown — not stated by the source
Wi-Fi standardsKnown for one802.11b, 802.11g, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)Unknown — not stated by the source
BluetoothKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Bluetooth versionKnown for one4.2Unknown — not stated by the source
Networking standardsDiffersIEEE 802.1Q, IEEE 802.1p, IEEE 802.3af, IEEE 802.3atIEEE 802.3af
Number of microphone arraysKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3
Number of speakersKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Ports & interfaces1 differ
RJ-45 ports quantityDiffers21
USB portKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
USB versionKnown for one2.0Unknown — not stated by the source
USB connector typeKnown for oneMicro-USB B, USB Type-AUnknown — not stated by the source
USB ports quantityKnown for one2Unknown — not stated by the source
Technical details1 differ
Compliance certificatesDiffersRoHS, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), CERoHS, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), CE, BSMI
Total carbon footprint (kg of CO2e)Known for one60Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers383 mm339 mm
DepthDiffers75 mm294 mm
HeightDiffers332 mm60 mm
WeightDiffers950 g735 g
Package widthKnown for one483 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one115 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one394 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Logistics data1 differ
Country of originDiffersChina, MexicoLaos
Packaging contentidentical
Ethernet cableKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More conference phone comparisons

All conference phone comparisons