Product comparison · 2 computer tv tuners

Hama DVB-T USB 2.0 Receiver vs Hama Nano DVB-T USB

14specifications compared
5differ
9identical
2known for one product only

Key differences

Teletext function
- DVB-T USB 2.0 Receiver:Yes
- Nano DVB-T USB:No
Weight
- DVB-T USB 2.0 Receiver:10 g
- Nano DVB-T USB:5 g
Dimensions (WxDxH)
- DVB-T USB 2.0 Receiver:52 x 22 x 10 mm
- Nano DVB-T USB:17 x 31 x 9 mm
Compatible operating systems
- DVB-T USB 2.0 Receiver:Windows XP/Vista
- Nano DVB-T USB:Win XP/Vista/7
I/O ports
- DVB-T USB 2.0 Receiver:1xcoaxial socket
- Nano DVB-T USB:1x Coax MCX

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of DVB-T USB 2.0 Receiver, Nano
16 specifications	A Hama DVB-T USB 2.0 Receiver View product	B Hama Nano DVB-T USB Model Nano View product
File formatsidentical
Video formats supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	MPEG2
Teletext1 differ
Teletext functionDiffers	Yes	No
Poweridentical
USB poweredKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers	10 g	5 g
Other features3 differ
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs	52 x 22 x 10 mm	17 x 31 x 9 mm
Compatible operating systemsDiffers	Windows XP/Vista	Win XP/Vista/7
I/O portsDiffers	1xcoaxial socket	1x Coax MCX

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More computer tv tuner comparisons

All computer tv tuner comparisons