Conceptronic TV Receiver vs Hama Nano DVB-T USB

Key differences

The Conceptronic TV Receiver has 195 g more weight than the Hama Nano DVB-T USB (200 g vs 5 g). Only the Conceptronic TV Receiver has remote control included. Only the Conceptronic TV Receiver has teletext function. Dimensions (WxDxH): 3 x 10.2 x 1.6 mm on the Conceptronic TV Receiver, 17 x 31 x 9 mm on the Hama Nano DVB-T USB. Compatible operating systems: Win XP, Vista, 7 on the Conceptronic TV Receiver, Win XP/Vista/7 on the Hama Nano DVB-T USB.

• Remote control included
  • TV Receiver:Yes
  • Nano DVB-T USB:No
• Teletext function
  • TV Receiver:Yes
  • Nano DVB-T USB:No
• Weight
  • TV Receiver:200 g
  • Nano DVB-T USB:5 g
• Dimensions (WxDxH)
  • TV Receiver:3 x 10.2 x 1.6 mm
  • Nano DVB-T USB:17 x 31 x 9 mm
• Compatible operating systems
  • TV Receiver:Win XP, Vista, 7
  • Nano DVB-T USB:Win XP/Vista/7
• FM radio
  • TV Receiver:Yes
  • Nano DVB-T USB:No