All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 computer cooling systems

UNYKAch AQUASPHERE PRO 360 TRX4 vs UNYKAch UNYCOOL H61

Add a product
  • 18specifications compared
  • 13differ
  • 5identical
  • 32known for one product only

Key differences

The UNYKAch AQUASPHERE PRO 360 TRX4 has 400 RPM more rotational speed (max) than the UNYKAch UNYCOOL H61 (2000 RPM vs 1600 RPM). The UNYKAch AQUASPHERE PRO 360 TRX4 has 10 dB more noise level (high speed) than the UNYKAch UNYCOOL H61 (35.6 dB vs 25.6 dB). The UNYKAch AQUASPHERE PRO 360 TRX4 has 3.01 cfm more maximum airflow than the UNYKAch UNYCOOL H61 (62.99 cfm vs 59.98 cfm). Type: Liquid cooling kit on the UNYKAch AQUASPHERE PRO 360 TRX4, Air cooler on the UNYKAch UNYCOOL H61. Bearing type: Ceramic bearing on the UNYKAch AQUASPHERE PRO 360 TRX4, Hydraulic on the UNYKAch UNYCOOL H61.

  • Type
    • Liquid cooling kit
    • Air cooler
  • Rotational speed (max)
    • 2000 RPM
    • 1600 RPM
  • Noise level (high speed)
    • 35.6 dB
    • 25.6 dB
  • Maximum airflow
    • 62.99 cfm
    • 59.98 cfm
  • Bearing type
    • Ceramic bearing
    • Hydraulic
  • Number of fan blades
    • 7
    • 9
  • Thermal Design Power (TDP)
    • 450 W
    • 180 W
  • Package width
    • 212 mm
    • 115 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
50 specifications
A

UNYKAch

AQUASPHERE PRO 360 TRX4View product
B

UNYKAch

UNYCOOL H61View product
Performance6 differ
TypeDiffersLiquid cooling kitAir cooler
Supported processor socketsDiffersSocket TR4LGA 1851, LGA 1700, LGA 1200 (Socket H5), LGA 1151 (Socket H4), LGA 1150 (Socket H3), LGA 1155 (Socket H2), LGA 1156 (Socket H), Socket AM5, Socket AM4, Socket AM3+, Socket AM3, Socket AM2, Socket AM2+, Socket FM2, Socket FM1
Rotational speed (min)Known for one800 RPM
Rotational speed (max)Differs2000 RPM1600 RPM
Noise level (high speed)Differs35.6 dB25.6 dB
Maximum airflowDiffers62.99 cfm59.98 cfm
Maximum air pressureKnown for one2.53 mmH2O
Bearing typeDiffersCeramic bearingHydraulic
Pump connectorKnown for one4-pin
Quantity per packKnown for one1 pc(s)
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Known for one40000 h
Noise level (low speed)Known for one32.6 dB
AirflowKnown for one1.783 m³/h
Fan bearing technologyKnown for oneHydraulic bearing
Design1 differ
Number of fan bladesDiffers79
Number of finsKnown for one38
Number of heat pipesKnown for one6
Radiator materialKnown for oneAluminum
Number of fansKnown for one3 fan(s)
Fan connectorKnown for one4-pin
Power1 differ
Starting voltageKnown for one12 V
Thermal Design Power (TDP)Differs450 W180 W
Weight & dimensions5 differ
WidthKnown for one74 mm
DepthKnown for one120 mm
HeightKnown for one151 mm
WeightKnown for one560 g
Heat pipes diameterKnown for one6 mm
Package widthDiffers212 mm115 mm
Package depthDiffers480 mm135 mm
Package heightDiffers133 mm172 mm
Package volumeDiffers13530 cm³2600 cm³
Package weightDiffers2.4 kg640 g
Radiator widthKnown for one39.5 cm
Radiator depthKnown for one3.8 cm
Radiator heightKnown for one12 cm
Tube lengthKnown for one40 cm
Technical detailsidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneRoHS, CE
Packaging contentidentical
Screws includedKnown for oneYes
Thermal pad includedKnown for oneYes
Mounting kitKnown for oneYes
Other featuresidentical
Heatsink dimensions (W x D x H)Known for one49 x 120 x 151 mm
Logistics dataidentical
Master (outer) case widthKnown for one420 mm
Master (outer) case lengthKnown for one595 mm
Master (outer) case heightKnown for one360 mm
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for one30 pc(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More computer cooling system comparisons

All computer cooling system comparisons