Product comparison · 2 computer cooling systems

GIGABYTE AORUS ELITE 360 ICE vs MSI MEG CORELIQUID E15 360

21specifications compared
13differ
8identical
21known for one product only

Key differences

Rotational speed (min)
- AORUS ELITE 360 ICE:500 RPM
- MEG CORELIQUID E15 360:800 RPM
Rotational speed (max)
- AORUS ELITE 360 ICE:2500 RPM
- MEG CORELIQUID E15 360:2300 RPM
Noise level (high speed)
- AORUS ELITE 360 ICE:38.8 dB
- MEG CORELIQUID E15 360:39.58 dB
Maximum airflow
- AORUS ELITE 360 ICE:73.39 cfm
- MEG CORELIQUID E15 360:217.91 cfm
Maximum air pressure
- AORUS ELITE 360 ICE:5.88 mmH2O
- MEG CORELIQUID E15 360:3.84 mmH2O
Fan noise level (max)
- AORUS ELITE 360 ICE:38.8 dB
- MEG CORELIQUID E15 360:39.58 dB
Fan speed (max)
- AORUS ELITE 360 ICE:2500 RPM
- MEG CORELIQUID E15 360:2300 RPM
Fan speed (min)
- AORUS ELITE 360 ICE:500 RPM
- MEG CORELIQUID E15 360:800 RPM

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of AORUS ELITE 360 ICE, MEG CORELIQUID E15 360
42 specifications	A GIGABYTE AORUS ELITE 360 ICE View product	B MSI MEG CORELIQUID E15 360 View product
Performance9 differ
Supported processor socketsDiffers	LGA 1851, Socket AM5, Socket AM4, LGA 1700	LGA 1700, LGA 1851, Socket AM4, Socket AM5
Rotational speed (min)Differs	500 RPM	800 RPM
Rotational speed (max)Differs	2500 RPM	2300 RPM
Noise level (high speed)Differs	38.8 dB	39.58 dB
Maximum airflowDiffers	73.39 cfm	217.91 cfm
Maximum air pressureDiffers	5.88 mmH2O	3.84 mmH2O
Fan noise level (max)Differs	38.8 dB	39.58 dB
Fan speed (max)Differs	2500 RPM	2300 RPM
Fan speed (min)Differs	500 RPM	800 RPM
Fan static pressureKnown for one	5.88 mmH2O	Unknown — not stated by the source
Pump motor speedKnown for one	3200 RPM	Unknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffers	White	Black
Number of fan bladesKnown for one	7	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of heat pipesKnown for one	2	Unknown — not stated by the source
Water block materialKnown for one	Copper	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display typeKnown for one	LCD	Unknown — not stated by the source
MaterialKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Aluminium, EPDM
Weight & dimensions3 differ
Radiator widthDiffers	12 cm	39.7 cm
Radiator depthDiffers	39.7 cm	3 cm
Radiator heightDiffers	2.7 cm	12.4 cm
Tube lengthKnown for one	42 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Pump widthKnown for one	8.6 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Pump depthKnown for one	9.65 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Pump heightKnown for one	8.52 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
WeightKnown for one	1.69 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package widthKnown for one	232 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one	440 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one	139 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one	2.79 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
WidthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	71.6 mm
DepthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	68.5 mm
HeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	65 mm
Fan dimensions (W x D x H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	362 x 125 x 28.4 mm
Poweridentical
Fan currentKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.68 A

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More computer cooling system comparisons

All computer cooling system comparisons