Product comparison · 2 computer cooling systems

CoolBox X12 Ring ARGB vs MSI MEG CORELIQUID E15 360

Add a product
  • 15specifications compared
  • 9differ
  • 6identical
  • 23known for one product only

Key differences

The CoolBox X12 Ring ARGB has 100 RPM more rotational speed (max) than the MSI MEG CORELIQUID E15 360 (2400 RPM vs 2300 RPM). The CoolBox X12 Ring ARGB has 0.62 dB more noise level (high speed) than the MSI MEG CORELIQUID E15 360 (40.2 dB vs 39.58 dB). The MSI MEG CORELIQUID E15 360 has 140.17 cfm more maximum airflow than the CoolBox X12 Ring ARGB (217.91 cfm vs 77.74 cfm). Suitable location: Computer case on the CoolBox X12 Ring ARGB, Processor on the MSI MEG CORELIQUID E15 360. Type: Fan on the CoolBox X12 Ring ARGB, All-in-one liquid cooler on the MSI MEG CORELIQUID E15 360.

  • Suitable location
    • X12 Ring ARGB:Computer case
    • MEG CORELIQUID E15 360:Processor
  • Type
    • X12 Ring ARGB:Fan
    • MEG CORELIQUID E15 360:All-in-one liquid cooler
  • Rotational speed (max)
    • X12 Ring ARGB:2400 RPM
    • MEG CORELIQUID E15 360:2300 RPM
  • Noise level (high speed)
    • X12 Ring ARGB:40.2 dB
    • MEG CORELIQUID E15 360:39.58 dB
  • Maximum airflow
    • X12 Ring ARGB:77.74 cfm
    • MEG CORELIQUID E15 360:217.91 cfm
  • Maximum air pressure
    • X12 Ring ARGB:3.39 mmH2O
    • MEG CORELIQUID E15 360:3.84 mmH2O
  • Width
    • X12 Ring ARGB:120 mm
    • MEG CORELIQUID E15 360:71.6 mm
  • Depth
    • X12 Ring ARGB:27 mm
    • MEG CORELIQUID E15 360:68.5 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of X12 Ring ARGB, MEG CORELIQUID E15 360
38 specifications
Performance6 differ
Suitable locationDiffersComputer caseProcessor
TypeDiffersFanAll-in-one liquid cooler
Fan diameter12 cm12 cm
Supported processor socketsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceLGA 1700, LGA 1851, Socket AM4, Socket AM5
Rotational speed (min)800 RPM800 RPM
Rotational speed (max)Differs2400 RPM2300 RPM
Noise level (high speed)Differs40.2 dB39.58 dB
Maximum airflowDiffers77.74 cfm217.91 cfm
Maximum air pressureDiffers3.39 mmH2O3.84 mmH2O
Bearing typeFluid Dynamic Bearing (FDB)Fluid Dynamic Bearing (FDB)
Fan noise level (max)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source39.58 dB
Fan speed (max)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2300 RPM
Fan speed (min)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source800 RPM
Noise level (low speed)Known for one18.9 dBUnknown — not stated by the source
Minimum airflow (imperial)Known for one27.99 cfmUnknown — not stated by the source
Minimum air pressureKnown for one0.44 mmH2OUnknown — not stated by the source
Quantity per packKnown for one1 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Fan's mean time to failure (MTTF)Known for one70000 hUnknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Product colourBlackBlack
MaterialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAluminium, EPDM
Radiator materialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAluminum
Number of fansKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3 fan(s)
Illumination LEDYesYes
Illumination colourMultiMulti
Number of fan bladesKnown for one7Unknown — not stated by the source
LED connector typeKnown for one3-pinUnknown — not stated by the source
Fan connectorKnown for one4-pinUnknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Fan currentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.68 A
VoltageKnown for one12 VUnknown — not stated by the source
LED voltageKnown for one5 VUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers120 mm71.6 mm
DepthDiffers27 mm68.5 mm
HeightDiffers125 mm65 mm
Radiator widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source39.7 cm
Radiator depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3 cm
Radiator heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source12.4 cm
Fan dimensions (W x D x H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source362 x 125 x 28.4 mm
WeightKnown for one205 gUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More computer cooling system comparisons

All computer cooling system comparisons