Product comparison · 2 computer cooling systems

ASUS ROG Strix SLC IV 360 ARGB LCD vs Mars Gaming ML-LCDPRO360W Processor All-in-one liquid cooler

Add a product
  • 27specifications compared
  • 15differ
  • 12identical
  • 34known for one product only

Key differences

The ASUS ROG Strix SLC IV 360 ARGB LCD has 5.97 cfm more maximum airflow than the Mars Gaming ML-LCDPRO360W Processor All-in-one liquid cooler (82.57 cfm vs 76.6 cfm). The ASUS ROG Strix SLC IV 360 ARGB LCD has 9.78 dB more fan noise level (max) than the Mars Gaming ML-LCDPRO360W Processor All-in-one liquid cooler (35.78 dB vs 26 dB). The ASUS ROG Strix SLC IV 360 ARGB LCD has 200 RPM more fan speed (max) than the Mars Gaming ML-LCDPRO360W Processor All-in-one liquid cooler (2500 RPM vs 2300 RPM). Product colour: Black on the ASUS ROG Strix SLC IV 360 ARGB LCD, White on the Mars Gaming ML-LCDPRO360W Processor All-in-one liquid cooler. Display diagonal: 12.9 cm (5.08") on the ASUS ROG Strix SLC IV 360 ARGB LCD, 7.11 cm (2.8") on the Mars Gaming ML-LCDPRO360W Processor All-in-one liquid cooler.

  • Maximum airflow
    • ROG Strix SLC IV 360 ARGB LCD:82.57 cfm
    • ML-LCDPRO360W Processor All-in-one liquid cooler:76.6 cfm
  • Fan noise level (max)
    • ROG Strix SLC IV 360 ARGB LCD:35.78 dB
    • ML-LCDPRO360W Processor All-in-one liquid cooler:26 dB
  • Fan speed (max)
    • ROG Strix SLC IV 360 ARGB LCD:2500 RPM
    • ML-LCDPRO360W Processor All-in-one liquid cooler:2300 RPM
  • Product colour
    • ROG Strix SLC IV 360 ARGB LCD:Black
    • ML-LCDPRO360W Processor All-in-one liquid cooler:White
  • Display diagonal
    • ROG Strix SLC IV 360 ARGB LCD:12.9 cm (5.08")
    • ML-LCDPRO360W Processor All-in-one liquid cooler:7.11 cm (2.8")
  • Radiator width
    • ROG Strix SLC IV 360 ARGB LCD:39.7 cm
    • ML-LCDPRO360W Processor All-in-one liquid cooler:39.5 cm
  • Radiator depth
    • ROG Strix SLC IV 360 ARGB LCD:12.6 cm
    • ML-LCDPRO360W Processor All-in-one liquid cooler:12 cm
  • Radiator height
    • ROG Strix SLC IV 360 ARGB LCD:2.7 cm
    • ML-LCDPRO360W Processor All-in-one liquid cooler:2.8 cm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of ROG Strix SLC IV 360 ARGB LCD, ML-LCDPRO360W
61 specifications
Performance4 differ
Suitable locationProcessorProcessor
TypeAll-in-one liquid coolerAll-in-one liquid cooler
Fan diameter12 cm12 cm
Supported processor socketsDiffersSocket AM4, Socket AM5, LGA 1700, LGA 1851LGA 1851, LGA 1150 (Socket H3), LGA 1151 (Socket H4), LGA 1155 (Socket H2), LGA 1156 (Socket H), LGA 1200 (Socket H5), LGA 1366 (Socket B), LGA 1700, LGA 2011 (Socket R), LGA 2011-v3 (Socket R), LGA 2066, Socket AM4, Socket AM5
Minimum airflow (imperial)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source27.2 cfm
Maximum airflowDiffers82.57 cfm76.6 cfm
Pulse-width modulation (PWM) supportYesYes
Bearing typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceHydraulic
Fan noise level (min)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source9 dB
Fan noise level (max)Differs35.78 dB26 dB
Pump noise levelKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source15 dB
Pump connectorKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3-pin
Quantity per pack1 pc(s)1 pc(s)
Fan speed (max)Differs2500 RPM2300 RPM
Fan speed (min)800 RPM800 RPM
Pump motor speedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2800 RPM
Fan static pressureKnown for one4.36 mmH2OUnknown — not stated by the source
Design2 differ
Product colourDiffersBlackWhite
Radiator materialAluminumAluminum
Base plate materialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCopper
Number of fans3 fan(s)3 fan(s)
Fins materialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAluminium
Illumination LEDYesYes
Illumination colourMultiMulti
LED connector typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3-pin
Fan connectorKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4-pin
Display diagonalDiffers12.9 cm (5.08")7.11 cm (2.8")
Display typeLCDLCD
Water block materialKnown for oneCopperUnknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
VoltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source12 V
Fan currentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.15 A
Fan voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source12 V
LED currentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.25 A
LED voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 V
Rated currentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.25 A
Thermal Design Power (TDP)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source600 W
Weight & dimensions9 differ
WidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source360 mm
Radiator widthDiffers39.7 cm39.5 cm
Radiator depthDiffers12.6 cm12 cm
Radiator heightDiffers2.7 cm2.8 cm
Tube lengthDiffers25 cm40 cm
Pump widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source7 cm
Pump depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source8.4 cm
Pump heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4.8 cm
WeightDiffers2.23 kg1.47 kg
Fan dimensions (W x D x H)Differs360 x 124 x 26.5 mm120 x 120 x 25 mm
Package widthDiffers415 mm455 mm
Package depthDiffers210 mm203 mm
Package heightDiffers169.5 mm142 mm
Waterblock widthKnown for one12.3 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Waterblock depthKnown for one9.9 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Waterblock heightKnown for one9.17 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one3.61 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Package typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBox
Mounting kitKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Screws includedYesYes
ManualKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Cables includedKnown for oneFanUnknown — not stated by the source
Installation instructionKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Thermal greaseKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Technical detailsidentical
Warranty periodKnown for one6 year(s)Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More computer cooling system comparisons

All computer cooling system comparisons