Product comparison · 2 computer cooling systems

ARCTIC P12 PWM PST vs ARCTIC BioniX P120 (Red) – Pressure-optimised

Add a product
  • 31specifications compared
  • 13differ
  • 18identical
  • 6known for one product only

Key differences

The ARCTIC BioniX P120 (Red) – Pressure-optimised has 300 RPM more rotational speed (max) than the ARCTIC P12 PWM PST (2100 RPM vs 1800 RPM). The ARCTIC BioniX P120 (Red) – Pressure-optimised has 0.15 sone more noise level than the ARCTIC P12 PWM PST (0.45 sone vs 0.3 sone). The ARCTIC BioniX P120 (Red) – Pressure-optimised has 11.26 cfm more maximum airflow than the ARCTIC P12 PWM PST (67.56 cfm vs 56.3 cfm). Product colour: Black, Transparent on the ARCTIC P12 PWM PST, Black, Red on the ARCTIC BioniX P120 (Red) – Pressure-optimised.

  • Rotational speed (max)
    • P12 PWM PST:1800 RPM
    • BioniX P120 (Red) – Pressure-optimised:2100 RPM
  • Noise level
    • P12 PWM PST:0.3 sone
    • BioniX P120 (Red) – Pressure-optimised:0.45 sone
  • Maximum airflow
    • P12 PWM PST:56.3 cfm
    • BioniX P120 (Red) – Pressure-optimised:67.56 cfm
  • Airflow
    • P12 PWM PST:95.65 m³/h
    • BioniX P120 (Red) – Pressure-optimised:114.79 m³/h
  • Product colour
    • P12 PWM PST:Black, Transparent
    • BioniX P120 (Red) – Pressure-optimised:Black, Red
  • Power consumption (typical)
    • P12 PWM PST:0.96 W
    • BioniX P120 (Red) – Pressure-optimised:1.56 W
  • Rated current
    • P12 PWM PST:0.08 A
    • BioniX P120 (Red) – Pressure-optimised:0.13 A
  • Height
    • P12 PWM PST:25 mm
    • BioniX P120 (Red) – Pressure-optimised:27 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of P12 PWM PST, P120
37 specifications
Performance4 differ
Rotational speed (max)Differs1800 RPM2100 RPM
Noise levelDiffers0.3 sone0.45 sone
Maximum airflowDiffers56.3 cfm67.56 cfm
AirflowDiffers95.65 m³/h114.79 m³/h
Maximum air pressureKnown for one2.2 mmH2OUnknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffersBlack, TransparentBlack, Red
Power2 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs0.96 W1.56 W
Rated currentDiffers0.08 A0.13 A
Starting voltageKnown for one3.9 VUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions6 differ
HeightDiffers25 mm27 mm
WeightDiffers145 g140 g
Package widthDiffers123 mm130 mm
Package depthDiffers123 mm125 mm
Package heightDiffers27 mm34 mm
Package weightDiffers176 g175 g
Technical detailsidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceRoHS
Other featuresidentical
Mounting hole pattern (W x D)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source105 x 105 mm
Country of originKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceChina
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source84733080

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More computer cooling system comparisons

All computer cooling system comparisons