Product comparison · 2 computer cooling systems

ARCTIC Freezer 36-S vs ASUS ROG Eurux GR120 ARGB Fan White Single Pack

Add a product
  • 10specifications compared
  • 6differ
  • 4identical
  • 28known for one product only

Key differences

The ARCTIC Freezer 36-S has 473 g more weight than the ASUS ROG Eurux GR120 ARGB Fan White Single Pack (685 g vs 212 g). Only the ASUS ROG Eurux GR120 ARGB Fan White Single Pack has illumination LED. Suitable location: Processor on the ARCTIC Freezer 36-S, Computer case on the ASUS ROG Eurux GR120 ARGB Fan White Single Pack. Type: Air cooler on the ARCTIC Freezer 36-S, Fan on the ASUS ROG Eurux GR120 ARGB Fan White Single Pack. Product colour: Black, Stainless steel on the ARCTIC Freezer 36-S, White on the ASUS ROG Eurux GR120 ARGB Fan White Single Pack.

  • Suitable location
    • Freezer 36-S:Processor
    • ROG Eurux GR120 ARGB Fan White Single Pack:Computer case
  • Type
    • Freezer 36-S:Air cooler
    • ROG Eurux GR120 ARGB Fan White Single Pack:Fan
  • Product colour
    • Freezer 36-S:Black, Stainless steel
    • ROG Eurux GR120 ARGB Fan White Single Pack:White
  • Illumination LED
    • Freezer 36-S:No
    • ROG Eurux GR120 ARGB Fan White Single Pack:Yes
  • Weight
    • Freezer 36-S:685 g
    • ROG Eurux GR120 ARGB Fan White Single Pack:212 g
  • Fan dimensions (W x D x H)
    • Freezer 36-S:120 x 120 x 25 mm
    • ROG Eurux GR120 ARGB Fan White Single Pack:120 x 122 x 30 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of Freezer 36-S, ROG Eurux GR120 ARGB Fan White Single Pack
38 specifications
Performance2 differ
Suitable locationDiffersProcessorComputer case
TypeDiffersAir coolerFan
Supported processor socketsKnown for oneLGA 1851, LGA 1700, Socket AM5, Socket AM4Unknown — not stated by the source
Rotational speed (min)Known for one600 RPMUnknown — not stated by the source
Rotational speed (max)Known for one3000 RPMUnknown — not stated by the source
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one0 - 40 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Maximum airflowKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source85 cfm
Fan noise level (max)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source33 dB
Fan speed (max)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2600 RPM
Fan static pressureKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4.5 mmH2O
Design2 differ
Product colourDiffersBlack, Stainless steelWhite
Number of fansKnown for one1 fan(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of finsKnown for one54Unknown — not stated by the source
Fins materialKnown for oneAluminiumUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of heat pipesKnown for one4Unknown — not stated by the source
Illumination LEDDiffersNoYes
Fan connectorKnown for one4-pinUnknown — not stated by the source
Display typeKnown for oneNot applicableUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of LEDsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source36
Illumination colourKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMulti
Poweridentical
Fan currentKnown for one0.33 AUnknown — not stated by the source
Fan voltageKnown for one12 VUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions2 differ
WidthKnown for one88 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one126 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one156 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
WeightDiffers685 g212 g
Fan dimensions (W x D x H)Differs120 x 120 x 25 mm120 x 122 x 30 mm
Heat pipes diameterKnown for one6 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Fins thicknessKnown for one0.4 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Cable lengthKnown for one0.2 mUnknown — not stated by the source
Package widthKnown for one170 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one195 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one116 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one990 gUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More computer cooling system comparisons

All computer cooling system comparisons