Product comparison · 2 computer cooling systems

ARCTIC Accelero Xtreme 9800 vs ARCTIC Freezer 64 Pro PWM

Key differences

Weight
- Accelero Xtreme 9800:560 g
- Freezer 64 Pro PWM:528 g
Bearing technology
- Accelero Xtreme 9800:Fluid Dynamic
- Freezer 64 Pro PWM:Ceramic Bearing
Dimensions (WxDxH)
- Accelero Xtreme 9800:88 x 248 x 31 mm
- Freezer 64 Pro PWM:96.5 x 107 x 126.5 mm
Rotational speed
- Accelero Xtreme 9800:700 RPM
- Freezer 64 Pro PWM:900 RPM
Airflow
- Accelero Xtreme 9800:3 x 20 CFM
- Freezer 64 Pro PWM:40 CFM

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Accelero Xtreme 9800, Freezer 64 Pro PWM
17 specifications	A ARCTIC Accelero Xtreme 9800 View product	B ARCTIC Freezer 64 Pro PWM View product
Performance1 differ
Suitable locationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Processor
Supported processor socketsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Socket 754, Socket 939, Socket AM2, Socket AM2+
Compatible productsDiffers	nVIDIA GeForce 9800GTX+, 9800GTX, 9800GT	AMD Socket AM3, AM2+, AM2, 939, 754
Designidentical
Product colourKnown for one	Black, Silver	Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Rated currentKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.16 A
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers	560 g	528 g
Technical details1 differ
Bearing technologyDiffers	Fluid Dynamic	Ceramic Bearing
Other features3 differ
Thermal resistanceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.18°C/Watt
Connector(s)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4-pin
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs	88 x 248 x 31 mm	96.5 x 107 x 126.5 mm
Rotational speedDiffers	700 RPM	900 RPM
AirflowDiffers	3 x 20 CFM	40 CFM
Heat sink dimensionsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	104 x 58 x 126.5 mm
Product lifeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	137000 h

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.