Product comparison · 2 computer cooling systems

Aerocool Cosmo 12 vs Aerocool Eclipse 12 Pro

Add a product
  • 21specifications compared
  • 10differ
  • 11identical
  • 5known for one product only

Key differences

  • Rotational speed (max)
    • Cosmo 12:1000 RPM
    • Eclipse 12 Pro:1200 RPM
  • Noise level (high speed)
    • Cosmo 12:23.9 dB
    • Eclipse 12 Pro:19.8 dB
  • Maximum airflow
    • Cosmo 12:26.2 cfm
    • Eclipse 12 Pro:32.1 cfm
  • Maximum air pressure
    • Cosmo 12:1.1 mmH2O
    • Eclipse 12 Pro:1.27 mmH2O
  • Bearing type
    • Cosmo 12:Sleeve bearing
    • Eclipse 12 Pro:Hydraulic
  • Mean time between failures (MTBF)
    • Cosmo 12:40000 h
    • Eclipse 12 Pro:60000 h
  • Number of fans
    • Cosmo 12:1 fan(s)
    • Eclipse 12 Pro:3 fan(s)
  • Number of fan blades
    • Cosmo 12:9
    • Eclipse 12 Pro:7

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of Cosmo 12, Eclipse 12 Pro
26 specifications
Performance6 differ
Rotational speed (max)Differs1000 RPM1200 RPM
Noise level (high speed)Differs23.9 dB19.8 dB
Maximum airflowDiffers26.2 cfm32.1 cfm
Maximum air pressureDiffers1.1 mmH2O1.27 mmH2O
Bearing typeDiffersSleeve bearingHydraulic
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Differs40000 h60000 h
Design2 differ
Number of fansDiffers1 fan(s)3 fan(s)
Number of fan bladesDiffers97
Fan connectorKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source6-pin
Number of LEDsKnown for one15Unknown — not stated by the source
Power2 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs3.72 W7.2 W
Rated currentDiffers0.31 A0.6 A
Packaging contentidentical
Screws includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Remote control includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source84733080

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More computer cooling system comparisons

All computer cooling system comparisons