Product comparison · 2 computer cases

XPG STARKERAIRC4VAWG WH C TW vs Zolyd Noct Tower Black

Add a product
  • 31specifications compared
  • 13differ
  • 18identical
  • 22known for one product only

Key differences

The XPG STARKERAIRC4VAWG WH C TW has 1 more 3.5" bays than the Zolyd Noct Tower Black (3 vs 2). The XPG STARKERAIRC4VAWG WH C TW has 1 more 2.5" bays than the Zolyd Noct Tower Black (3 vs 2). The Zolyd Noct Tower Black has 0.5 cm more maximum graphics card length than the XPG STARKERAIRC4VAWG WH C TW (35.5 cm vs 35 cm). Form factor: Midi Tower on the XPG STARKERAIRC4VAWG WH C TW, Tower on the Zolyd Noct Tower Black. Material: SPCC, Tempered glass on the XPG STARKERAIRC4VAWG WH C TW, SPCC, Metal, Rubber, Plastic on the Zolyd Noct Tower Black.

  • Form factor
    • STARKERAIRC4VAWG WH C TW:Midi Tower
    • Noct Tower Black:Tower
  • Material
    • STARKERAIRC4VAWG WH C TW:SPCC, Tempered glass
    • Noct Tower Black:SPCC, Metal, Rubber, Plastic
  • Product colour
    • STARKERAIRC4VAWG WH C TW:White, Transparent
    • Noct Tower Black:Black
  • Number of 3.5" bays
    • STARKERAIRC4VAWG WH C TW:3
    • Noct Tower Black:2
  • Number of 2.5" bays
    • STARKERAIRC4VAWG WH C TW:3
    • Noct Tower Black:2
  • Maximum graphics card length
    • STARKERAIRC4VAWG WH C TW:35 cm
    • Noct Tower Black:35.5 cm
  • Front fans installed
    • STARKERAIRC4VAWG WH C TW:3x 120 mm
    • Noct Tower Black:2x 120 mm
  • Width
    • STARKERAIRC4VAWG WH C TW:215 mm
    • Noct Tower Black:210 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of STARKERAIRC4VAWG WH C TW, Noct
53 specifications
Design6 differ
Form factorDiffersMidi TowerTower
MaterialDiffersSPCC, Tempered glassSPCC, Metal, Rubber, Plastic
Product colourDiffersWhite, TransparentBlack
Number of 3.5" baysDiffers32
Number of 5.25" baysKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0
Number of 2.5" baysDiffers32
Number of expansion slotsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source7
Side windowKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Suitable forKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceHome/Office
LED indicatorsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Maximum graphics card lengthDiffers35 cm35.5 cm
Number of storage drives supportedKnown for one5Unknown — not stated by the source
Anti-dust filterKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
RGB control buttonKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Maximum PSU lengthKnown for one16 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Power supplyidentical
Power supply locationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBottom
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0
USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-A ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0
USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 Type-C ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0
Cooling1 differ
Front fans installedDiffers3x 120 mm2x 120 mm
Number of bottom fans supported (max)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2
Bottom fans diameters supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source120 mm
Liquid cooling capabilityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Rear radiator sizes supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source120 mm
Storageidentical
HDD/SSD combo cageKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions5 differ
WidthDiffers215 mm210 mm
DepthDiffers400 mm410 mm
HeightDiffers465 mm450 mm
WeightDiffers7.37 kg6.3 kg
Material thicknessDiffers4 mm0.5 mm
Packaging data1 differ
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source497 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source262 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source465 mm
Package weightDiffers8.8 kg7.2 kg
Technical detailsidentical
Warranty periodKnown for one2 year(s)Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More computer case comparisons

All computer case comparisons