Product comparison · 2 computer cases

GIGABYTE MIB T3140 vs GIGABYTE Sumo 5112

Add a product
  • 13specifications compared
  • 8differ
  • 5identical
  • 7known for one product only

Key differences

  • Form factor
    • MIB T3140:Desktop
    • Sumo 5112:Midi Tower
  • Material
    • MIB T3140:ABS synthetics
    • Sumo 5112:Aluminium
  • Width
    • MIB T3140:268 mm
    • Sumo 5112:205 mm
  • Depth
    • MIB T3140:319 mm
    • Sumo 5112:522 mm
  • Height
    • MIB T3140:70 mm
    • Sumo 5112:570 mm
  • Weight
    • MIB T3140:4 kg
    • Sumo 5112:12.1 kg
  • External drive bays
    • MIB T3140:1 x slim ODD, 1 x 3.5"
    • Sumo 5112:4 x 5.25", 1 x 3.5"
  • Internal drive bays
    • MIB T3140:1 x 3.5"
    • Sumo 5112:5 x 3.5"

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of MIB T3140, Sumo 5112
20 specifications
Design2 differ
Form factorDiffersDesktopMidi Tower
TypePCPC
MaterialDiffersABS syntheticsAluminium
Product colourBlackBlack
Supported motherboard form factorsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceATX, CEB
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB 2.0 ports quantity22
Audio inputYesYes
Audio outputYesYes
Firewire (IEEE 1394) portsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
eSATA ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers268 mm205 mm
DepthDiffers319 mm522 mm
HeightDiffers70 mm570 mm
WeightDiffers4 kg12.1 kg
Other features2 differ
External drive baysDiffers1 x slim ODD, 1 x 3.5"4 x 5.25", 1 x 3.5"
Internal drive baysDiffers1 x 3.5"5 x 3.5"
Optional fansKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3 x 120mm
Expansion slotsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source7
Main board sizeKnown for one6.75 x 6.75"Unknown — not stated by the source
Power supplyidentical
Power supplyKnown for one100 WUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More computer case comparisons

All computer case comparisons