Product comparison · 2 computer cases

GIGABYTE Luxo X10 vs HP Z420 600W 90% Efficient Chassis

13specifications compared
10differ
3identical
22known for one product only

Key differences

Form factor
- Luxo X10:Midi Tower
- Z420 600W 90% Efficient Chassis:Mini Tower
Supported motherboard form factors
- Luxo X10:ATX, micro ATX
- Z420 600W 90% Efficient Chassis:ATX
Number of 3.5" bays
- Luxo X10:0
- Z420 600W 90% Efficient Chassis:3
Number of 5.25" bays
- Luxo X10:4
- Z420 600W 90% Efficient Chassis:3
Number of internal 3.5" bays
- Luxo X10:4
- Z420 600W 90% Efficient Chassis:3
Power supply included
- Luxo X10:No
- Z420 600W 90% Efficient Chassis:Yes
Power supply location
- Luxo X10:Bottom
- Z420 600W 90% Efficient Chassis:Top
Width
- Luxo X10:180 mm
- Z420 600W 90% Efficient Chassis:177.8 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Luxo X10, Z420 600W 90% Efficient Chassis
35 specifications	A GIGABYTE Luxo X10 View product	B HP Z420 600W 90% Efficient Chassis View product
Design5 differ
Form factorDiffers	Midi Tower	Mini Tower
MaterialKnown for one	SGCC	Unknown — not stated by the source
Supported motherboard form factorsDiffers	ATX, micro ATX	ATX
Number of 3.5" baysDiffers	0	3
Number of 5.25" baysDiffers	4	3
Number of internal 3.5" baysDiffers	4	3
Number of expansion slotsKnown for one	7	Unknown — not stated by the source
Side windowKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Reset buttonKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of external 5.25" baysKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3
Power supply2 differ
Power supply includedDiffers	No	Yes
Power supply locationDiffers	Bottom	Top
Power supplyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	600 W
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one	0	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantityKnown for one	2	Unknown — not stated by the source
Audio inputKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Audio outputKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Coolingidentical
Number of front fans supported (max)Known for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Front fans diameters supportedKnown for one	120 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of side fans supported (max)Known for one	2	Unknown — not stated by the source
Side fans diameters supportedKnown for one	120 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Rear fans installedKnown for one	1x 120 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of rear fans supported (max)Known for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Rear fans diameters supportedKnown for one	120 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Top fans installedKnown for one	2x 120 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of top fans supported (max)Known for one	2	Unknown — not stated by the source
Top fans diameters supportedKnown for one	120 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers	180 mm	177.8 mm
DepthDiffers	430 mm	447.6 mm
HeightDiffers	440 mm	445.2 mm
WeightKnown for one	5.7 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Material thicknessKnown for one	0.5 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More computer case comparisons

All computer case comparisons