Product comparison · 2 coffee makers

Krups Essenza Mini XN110 vs Philips Senseo HD6564/60 coffee maker Fully-auto Pod coffee machine

16specifications compared
11differ
5identical
27known for one product only

Key differences

Water tank capacity
- Essenza Mini XN110:0.6 L
- Senseo HD6564/60 coffee maker Fully-auto Pod coffee machine:0.9 L
Coffee maker type
- Essenza Mini XN110:Manual
- Senseo HD6564/60 coffee maker Fully-auto Pod coffee machine:Fully-auto
Coffee input type
- Essenza Mini XN110:Coffee capsule
- Senseo HD6564/60 coffee maker Fully-auto Pod coffee machine:Coffee pod
Multi beverage
- Essenza Mini XN110:Yes
- Senseo HD6564/60 coffee maker Fully-auto Pod coffee machine:No
Power
- Essenza Mini XN110:1310 W
- Senseo HD6564/60 coffee maker Fully-auto Pod coffee machine:1450 W
AC input voltage
- Essenza Mini XN110:220–240
- Senseo HD6564/60 coffee maker Fully-auto Pod coffee machine:220 - 240 V
AC input frequency
- Essenza Mini XN110:50-60 Hz
- Senseo HD6564/60 coffee maker Fully-auto Pod coffee machine:50 Hz
Width
- Essenza Mini XN110:84 mm
- Senseo HD6564/60 coffee maker Fully-auto Pod coffee machine:190 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Essenza Mini XN110, HD6564/60
43 specifications	A Krups Essenza Mini XN110 View product	B Philips Senseo HD6564/60 coffee maker Fully-auto Pod coffee machine Model HD6564/60 View product
Performance3 differ
Product typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Pod coffee machine
Water tank capacityDiffers	0.6 L	0.9 L
Coffee maker typeDiffers	Manual	Fully-auto
Coffee input typeDiffers	Coffee capsule	Coffee pod
Coffee capsule/pod systemKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Senseo
Reservoir for brewed coffeeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Cup
Capacity in cupsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	6 cups
Maximum operating pressureKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 bar
Built-in grinderKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Adjustable coffee strengthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Number of spoutsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2
Hot water systemKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Cooking functions & programs1 differ
Multi beverageDiffers	Yes	No
Espresso makingKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Lungo makingKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Housing materialKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Metal
Built-in displayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Cord lengthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.8 m
Easy to cleanKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Easy to useKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Used capsules container capacityKnown for one	6 pc(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Adjustable drip trayKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of adjustable drip tray positionsKnown for one	2	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power3 differ
PowerDiffers	1310 W	1450 W
AC input voltageDiffers	220–240	220 - 240 V
AC input frequencyDiffers	50-60 Hz	50 Hz
Auto power offKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Auto power off after (max)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	30 min
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	84 mm	190 mm
DepthDiffers	330 mm	310 mm
HeightDiffers	204 mm	340 mm
WeightDiffers	2.3 kg	1.75 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Quantity per packKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 pc(s)
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	232 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	370 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	380 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2.4 kg
Packaging contentidentical
ManualKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More coffee maker comparisons

All coffee maker comparisons